Epics

If you set an Epic on a Feature it should automatically inherit the initiative of the Epic. You could keep some flexibility if you want to allow customers to change the initiative afterwards, but I would be surprised if there was a feature that ma...

The prioritization screen is a great, consolidated way to prioritize epics or features. However, when using this to rank epics and then saving, the rank is not what is reflected in the Epic Rank field. This is still overwritten based on the positi...

Currently the other projects come first so I always have to scroll down masses to find my epics. maybe if ones from the same project came first that would help. Otherwise a config to disallow cross project sharing.

The recent update of the scorecards (which I generally like) comes with waaay too short labels. Generally I don't see a reason for the cards being so tiny and labels being truncated. Bigger cards, allowing for more (meaningful) content, would be v...

When assigning an Epic to an Initiaitve, it would be very nice to have that Initiative cascade to the Epic's Features and Requirements. Likewise, when assigning a Feature/Requirement to an Epic, it should inherit the Epic's Initiative.

There was a recent change to the formatting of the backlog releases v. actual releases on the epic/feature boards. This is creating bad formatting for those of us using dark readers to help with eyesight/migraines. Please update the formatting so ...

When exporting an Epic with a custom layout definition to either PNG or PDF format, the custom layout definition is not used. Instead, the default layout is used with the the Overview tab over in the right panel. Since the right panel is a narrow ...

Please provide an option to pre-populate the list of teams in the capacity planning section of each epic. We have 14 teams where we're capturing estimates. When entering capacity data, it's very onerous having to manually add a row for each team t...

As we were doing some training today on Aha, it occurred to me that we use the default name of "Master Feature" that Aha! provides. The term "master" as it relates to this usage has some deep negative connotations that started back with slavery. (...

Capacity for teams is a great way to create a high level plan so that we can determine whether or not the roadmap is possible. We would like to extend it so that we can report on progress. How is it going? Are we on track?