Respect typical agile hierarchy

The current hierarchy is either too high, either too low for adequate product breakdown, and hence create difficulties in work assignment and follow up.

Initiative to Epic=ok, Feature to Feature, ADD User Story level in between, Reqs to Reqs=ok

  • Guest
  • Dec 3 2016
  • Shipped
Release time frame
  • Mar 29, 2017

    Admin Response

    Today, we have introduced Master features -- a powerful new capability for your bigger work items. These can also be used as epics to group your stories.

    Read more about it in out blog post: 

  • Attach files
  • Guest commented
    December 03, 2016 12:04

    If you're reluctant about this, a feauture to feature and reqs to reqs decomposition as exists for product lines would allow for even greater flexibility and likewise provide a more robust product breakdown capability.

  • Max Cascone commented
    December 09, 2016 19:48

    You could use To-Dos at any level to provide a sub-level item. We sometimes map Requirement To-Dos as tasks.

  • Max Cascone commented
    December 13, 2016 20:32

    I don't really understand this request... there are To Do's at every level that can be used for intermediate items. You can also re-name the terminology used for each item to fit your workflow better.