We use a custom timescale to communicate to our business stakeholders when a particular feature or initiative willl land. We would like to show that custom timescale on a roadmap.

We get a lot of requests via email that are already a feature in the system, but we still want to track the request. It is a pain to have to download the email and save it as an attachment on the feature.

We have many custom fields, som are "Entry Required by user", some are information only, would be good to highlight with a colour which a user has to focus on.

Hi Team, It would be great if we can have bulk edit for features parked in particular sprints. For an example, in below sprint board if I can bulk edit features it will save lot of time to not edit one by one individually.

The board currently just shows features in a release. Features descriptions are often contextualised by their relationship to an Initiative. Not showing initiatives as grouping of features in a release requires that the feature names carry informa...

We have a field on our epic cards called Integrations. It lists the ID# of the epid in ADO that our Epic in Aha is tied to. When I type a services id into my search field I do not find any results. If this were a searchable field in Aha I would ha...

Hi, I build and use software for more than 25 years. I use your software for 2 years now, and to be honest, i have never seen a software like yours. It is brilliant in its business use, it moves/change fast, its usage velocity is incredible thanks...

I would love to have the quadrants of each chart labeled (Sure things, big bets, quick wins, do not do) so it is easier to communicate what we are looking.

Personas within a single workspace can become unwieldy, especially for complex products that cater for a wide range of very different user groups and domains. It would be great to group personas within folders. Folders would also be useful to dist...

I'd also like to see it highlighted where things have changed since a benchmark on a release - which is a separate distinct issue. This needs to include all fields within Features. This is not achieved by inspection of each feature, my key stakeho...