Allow the JIRA integration to support mapping to more than one JIRA issue type and in Aha provide the ability to select the JIRA issue type to sync with
We use Aha for both Feature Requests and Defects and need to be able to designate if the JIRA issue type is an Epic, Story or Bug when linking to JIRA.
-
ADMIN RESPONSEJun 16, 2016
The best way to achieve this today is to would be to configure multiple JIRA integrations. Each integration would be separately linked to Epics, stories or bugs.
By putting this in place, this would allow you to create features and defects in Aha! and designate them in JIRA based on the issue type of interest.
3
MERGED
Enable creation of issues in Jira based on Feature & Feature Type so that Feature can be mapped to different Jira issue types
Would like ability to create more then one type of issue in Jira from a Feature in Aha. This would be useful to enable creation of Bugs and Spikes as formal issue types in Jira, while also tracking them accurately in Aha!. Essentially a one to man...
0
Already exists
© 2025 Aha! Labs Inc.•All rights reserved
Like everyone else, I'd also like this reopened for consideration. This doesn't already exist in the way we want it to.
Like status mappings, we should be able to create a predefined custom field and have the options mapped to the different Issue Types in JIRA. I understand the workaround presented; however, in cases where there may be two, three, four or even more issue types, having to individually configure multiple integrations creates an unnecessary time sink.
Same issue. This doesn't already exist, though i understand the work around.
For example, lack of this capability prevents me from pushing a whole release at once to JIRA. As that release can include both bugs and story & and improvement tickets. All of which must be sync'd separately.
I typed a lot and now your login process has deleted all my comments.
The same with this issue, I just want it to map over everything I dont need additional headaches, they serve no purpose. Thank you
I see no benefit on explcit mapping except more headache. When I click on Actions -> Link to JIRA I need to map to whatever issue type we ever defined in JIRA and or default issue types.
I have the same issue with the VSTS integration. Without a separate Bug type in the Aha schema, or ideally, a separate category in the Integration configuration for Bugs, you'd need to create a specific integration for Bugs that map Aha Features to VSTS (or Jira) Bugs.
Ditto to Heather and Marc. This feature doesn't already exist and if your work around is to create multiple Jira integrations you should provide instructions for how to do so.
So for this to work we have to install a JIRA integration for each Feature type? Can you provide some specific instructions on how the rest of the integration template should be filled out relating to the auto-import fields so we can implement the set up correctly?
This is something we desire also. Please remove the "Already Exists" label because that's not accurate and will garner it less attention.
Same thought as Kevin - an Idea that comes in may be a bug or a one line change, or it may be "epic-big". Having the ability to "Send to JIRA as..." and allowing the user to specify an Issue Type would be hugely helpful, even if it can only populate the shared fields.
Sorry here is the file
You misunderstood, look at the attached file. For the "Feature" issue type it can only be mapped to one JIRA issue type, I need to be able to map to one or more.