Skip to Main Content

Share your product feedback

Status Already exists
Categories Reports
Created by Guest
Created on Oct 15, 2019

Data Field Consistency

Currently when trying to report on the record number, it's name differently across all records. Can you please choose one naming convention to improve UX. 

  • Initiative: Reference #
  • Release: Reference
  • Feature: Key
  • Requirement: Reference #

I personally default to Key as that's the terminology in other record management systems I use. 

Thanks!

  • ADMIN RESPONSE
    Oct 24, 2024

    Thank you for the idea. This has been changed since the idea was submitted. The status of this idea was out of date.

  • Attach files
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Oct 22, 2019

    Hey ��� Apologies for the delay.. It was presented to me in a report so it very well could be they chose the wrong field, however, I did validate the others ���� Thanks!

  • Admin
    Austin Merritt
    Reply
    |
    Oct 18, 2019

    Hi there, thank you for pointing this out. These should all be "Reference #" for consistency. I am curious, can you let me know where you saw "Feature key"? Key is typically only used for fields coming to Aha! from integrations. In reports, I am seeing "Feature reference #." Thanks!