Who would benefit? |
This would benefit any teams that are using capacity planning for teams and estimate their work using custom named ranges |
What impact would it make? |
I would be able to set up one custom named ranges scenario that encompasses all records where I track these custom estimates. |
How should it work? |
Using t-shirt sizing as an example. Assume I estimate my work at the feature level and roll that up to an initiative. Currently, I would need to create two separate scenarios; one for my feature's named ranges and a second for my initiative's named ranges. If I were able to create a single scenario and specify S, M, L named ranges for features and separate S, M, L named ranges for initiatives on a single scenario it would mitigate overhead to manage these scenarios and keep my capacity reports more consistent. |