Ability to choose how each Aha Initiative/Feature/Requirement should be mapped to JIRA, as opposed to one mapping setting for an Aha product.
As a user, when creating a new Aha Initiative or Feature, I would like the ability to choose whether the Aha Initiative/Feature/Requirement should be mapped as a JIRA Epic, User Story, or Requirement, so that I can have more flexibility when creat...
Guest
almost 9 years ago
in
0
Unlikely to implement
Simplify adding existing Epics and Features to a User Story Map
When creating a new user story map, you usually add steps and then you might want to add existing records like Epics and Features under these steps. But adding an existing Epic or Feature from the "Add existing records" panel will just add those i...
Guest
about 2 years ago
in User story map
0
Future consideration
Show Requirement board like features & master features
On the board view, we currently have Master features and features but in some cases, there are enhancements scheduled at a story level (requirements). So like we can toggle between master features and features, if we can also view the requirements...
Arun Kalyanaraman
over 4 years ago
in Roadmaps
0
Future consideration
The custom fields that I have created in my custom table that appears in my Ideas Portal requires me to scroll horizontally for columns that are not spaced correctly. I recommend letting the information populate/appear vertically. See attached.
Leah Gralapp
over 3 years ago
in Ideas
1
Unlikely to implement
It would be beneficial to have a screen that's focused on orienting folks to what the product is and has a space for linking the key documents for quick access by the team members thats managed outside of Aha. Pitch decks, salesforce, rosters, etc.
Add features added in a story map to the bottom by default
Challenge When adding features in a story map, you usually add them top-to-bottom. if you later visit the feature board, the features will be in the opposite order -- the most recently added at the top, instead of the bottom. This feels very confu...
Nathaniel Collum
over 4 years ago
in User story map
0
Future consideration
Allow auto-import of JIRA issue without the need for a "parent record" (or just a pre-defined default like with manual import)
I was a bit confused when I could import items from JIRA manually, and webhooks were working both way, but when I made a new issue in JIRA, it was not getting auto-imported. I read through lots of really long explanations about the need for "paren...
Guest
over 7 years ago
in Jira
3
Unlikely to implement
Currently, integration webhooks are only available for Features and Releases. I would like to be able to integrate epics with integration webhooks so I can send epics to zapier, my own integrations, etc. At least enabling me to sidestep the poor s...
Nir Soffer
over 3 years ago
in Integrations
0
Future consideration
After I ship a release and move features to a later release, I want to see what release my feature was supposed to ship in, so I can understand how well we are hitting our release targets so we can plan future releases better. It should be an edit...
Michael Gillis
over 3 years ago
in Releases
0
Future consideration
Ability to configure integrations not to create new records in Aha
In the 1.0 integrations I had configured it to not try to create new Aha! records when records were created in JIRA.
I would like to be able to do the same in the 2.0 integrations. Currently when someone creates a new issue in JIRA I see this appe...
Kevin Burges
over 6 years ago
in Jira
0
Future consideration