Allow Aha! user name to populate DevOps board user
When working with multiple users, we need to be able who created what, commented on or changed something. As of right now, the user name (Admin) of who configured the Integration (Azure DevOps Services) is the one that appears on every item in Dev...
Currently custom tables cannot be integrated with Rally. In our environment we created a custom table to track Initiative Milestones and would like to integrate it with Rally Milestones, but that is not doable given the limitation.
Currently, when a feature or epic is created in Jira and pulled over to Aha! via the integration webhook, the created by user defaults to the Aha! user who is the webhook "run as" user. Even if there is mapping setup to map the Jira "Reporter" to ...
Requesting a change to Aha! Jira integration to allow for project level automation. Project level webhooks send payloads differently than system level payloads. If support for project level webhook payloads were added, we could enable multitudes o...
Guest
about 2 years ago
in Jira
0
Future consideration
Show name of user whose token is being used in ADO integration
Who would benefit? Admins of accounts with ADO integrations What impact would it make? When an ADO integration is created, a user with the correct permissions must enter their token to authenticate the integration. However, the token owner's name ...
Allow for Lookup Fields to be mapped in SFDC integration
Who would benefit? Everyone What impact would it make? Allows for further data collection from SFDC in Aha! How should it work? Similar to how other SFDC fields are currently mapped in today's configuration.
Guest
11 months ago
in Salesforce
0
Future consideration
Add better error handling for 'unhandled error exceptions'
When using AHA to integrate with other platforms such as Jira, sometimes fields are not mapped correctly due to either changes in Jira or custom fields in AHA. When this mismatch happens, we are only presented with 'unhandled error exception. Plea...
Guest
over 1 year ago
in Jira
0
Future consideration
For security reasons, we cannot have Aha! set to "allow anyone to access." Still, we need the ability to provide a seamless experience for our Executives and users to derive value from the Aha! data. We want to be able to display these in Tableau ...
Guest
almost 2 years ago
in Wanted
2
Future consideration
In some cases, Asana sub-tasks are more closely related to Aha! to-dos than requirements. For example, a feature may have to-dos related to marketing tasks which need to sync with Asana.
An option to map To-dos to Tasks or Subtask would provide a ...
Austin Merritt
over 6 years ago
in Asana / Integrations
4
Future consideration