Status Future consideration
Categories Strategy
Created by Project Parker
Created on Nov 2, 2017

Add Competitors, Business Model, Personas and Vision to be terms which can be renamed under 'Terminology'.

Competitors is not hugely relevant for the large areas of the product organisation currently working with. However, being able to re-use competitors and it's charting capability to represent some strategically important to them is. For example, it could be used to emphasise geography penetration, and create a profile per geography and show the level of adoption, maturity for each geography.

 

Business Model, and allowing it's name to be changed is just a terminology request as opposed to any other additional functionality. Same for Personas and Vision.

  • Attach files
  • Gina Pratico
    Sep 14, 2020

    This would also be helpful for us. We do use the Competitors and Personas and find it very useful but we would also like to have the freedom to add additional areas and update terminology for use with something else (i.e. storing vendor or partner information for our company or research findings as mentioned in another comment ... and much more!)

  • Simon Peters
    Mar 2, 2020

    We would want to use the competitor section as it is for strategic customer positioning...

  • Simon Peters
    Mar 2, 2020

    Any updates on this?

  • Anthony Stramer
    Sep 10, 2019

    This would be really valuable for me as well. Specifically, I'm looking for a good way to represent customer groups. The existing persona functionality would work really well, but without a rename it would potentially add a lot of confusion.

  • Guest
    May 31, 2018

    I can only eccho this feedback. Working with enterprise organizations, "Personas" isn't really accurate for research findings - as we merely cater to business processes for instance. Making these titles editable is of course one option, or a different name such as "Reseach Findings" could be another. Best regards, Malene from Tradeshift 

  • Guest
    Apr 18, 2018

    We would like to be able to clone one of these areas and customize the name, so we aren't limited to one choice - the default (competitors, biz model, personas, vision) or a re-named version..

  • Avatar160.e35e46fe62a53e488ef9451dd1d3432e
  • Avatar160.e35e46fe62a53e488ef9451dd1d3432e
  • Avatar160.e35e46fe62a53e488ef9451dd1d3432e

Ability to customize "Persona" field terminology

Merged
we refer to 'personas' as 'communities' - aligning more terminology will make the tool more relevant
Guest almost 5 years ago in Features 0 Future consideration

Customize Names at Third Level Down (e.g. Vision, Business Model, etc.)

Merged
This is useful because we all approach product development using different frameworks (e.g. LSU, JTBG, etc.), and need to customize the terminology throughout. Thx
Benjamin Snipes almost 4 years ago in Features 1 Future consideration

Make "Vision" part of the modifiable terminology

Merged
I can have a custom term even for "goal" but amazingly enough not for the highly political term "Vision". For us, Vision is reserved for the executive management, but I can make a "strategic claim", and I need have this reflected in the tool
Guest about 3 years ago in Strategy 0 Future consideration