What is the challenge? |
The custom types configured in the features status/workflow configuration display with the field name "Type" on the feature layouts. The "Type" term cannot be customized. |
What is the impact? |
The term "Type" doesn't align with how all teams use this type of categorization of features. |
Describe your idea |
It would be helpful to customize the term "Type" so the field name can be displayed with terminology that aligns with how teams refer to this categorization. |