All ideas
Sort by:
Trending
Status:
Future consideration
Showing 5668
3
VOTE
4
VOTE
Integrations 2.0: Allow Master Feature relationship for Requirements
I can create a relationship for Releases at the requirement level even though requirements do not inherently have a release field, this appears to be derived from the feature. I should also be able to create a relationship to the Master Feature in...
0
Future consideration
2
VOTE
Make comments individual records (that can be reported on)
We want to report on comments just like we can report on ideas. Specifically I would like to create a report on how many comments a user has created (as a measure for collaboration on ideas). Today this is not possible. I can only report on ideas ...
0
Future consideration
3
VOTE
Improve navigation - General UI&UX
Why use such a small window to work on a record? And why not allow to navigate through the records of a list?
When I work on a list of ideas - say I want to score them - I get the whole list and work one idea after the other. I have to click back...
1
Future consideration
3
VOTE
Enhanced Feature to Idea workflow
I would like to be able to further customize the workflow between Features and Ideas, based on Release status. For example, when a Release gets locked in (e.g. status changed to "in development" or similar), I would like the status of Ideas linked...
0
Future consideration
1
VOTE
Enable Google Keep Move and Pin
It would be great to allow for cards (epics, features, requirements) to move in any "card" based view. A great example is Google Keep (Web version on Desktop). Google Keep allows for easy moving of cards and pinning of favorites to the top. Add in...
0
Future consideration
1
VOTE
better validation warnings and units tips and handling on estimates fields
the toolips on estimates fields need consistent messaging in all field contexts, with proper messaging/tip content based on the units of the configuration. this needs to be the UX when creating (actual configured units not a hard-coded either/or t...
0
Future consideration
1
VOTE
please let admin better control the field choices on apply rank to users cannot make bad choice
apply rank opens a picker to let user decide which custom field to apply the rank value to , and that custom field needs to be the field in the mappings that provide update into target tooling (my case, its ADO, stack rank). I see multiple custom ...
0
Future consideration
1
VOTE
Allow using automation to change the parking lot of new features in Aha Develop
When creating automation for features in Aha Develop, it's not possible to change the parking lot (workspace) of the feature. There is a variety of fields that can be changed, but unfortunately, the parking lots are not among them. This would help...
0
Future consideration
1
VOTE
Better presentation of text when integrating to an existing field in ADO
Sometimes, the feature in ADO already exists, and I want to link it to a feature in Aha. When I do this, I'm presented with an un-readable HTML output of the description fields, making is pretty much impossible to actually see the differences. See...
0
Future consideration
© 2024 Aha! Labs Inc.•All rights reserved