All ideas
Sort by:
Trending
Filter by:
Status
Showing 9041 of 9041
9
VOTE
Record Fields should create Relationships
Expected behavior when adding a Record field to a layout is that when records are selected, a relationship link is created. Use Case: We need to drive people to link specific records and leveraged Record Fields; i.e. one or more release, one or mo...
1
Future consideration
9
VOTE
3
VOTE
Make private idea portal comment padlock indicator blue when used
Using a grayed-out padlock has me questioning each time I look if its actually a private message or not. Absense of padlock = public comment, presense of gray padlock = private comment. I would rather gray padlock = public comment, blue padlock = ...
2
Future consideration
3
VOTE
Move the scorecard chart into the roadmaps & custom reports section
The configurable chart functionality for ideas is fantastic, extremely flexible and interactive with the record score card. When scores are added to other record types, there isn't a comparable tool. Initiatives have a chart, but adding a scorecar...
0
Future consideration
2
VOTE
Displaying requirements within the Retrospective report
Who would benefit? Our dev management team What impact would it make? Would provide much better insights into why a release went off track. Currently the "Records Added" section lists Epics & Features added after dev started. In our case, it's...
0
Future consideration
4
VOTE
8
VOTE
Automation: Allow an option to clear multi-value fields
At present, for Users-type custom fields, the automation options are: Add, Remove and 'Same As'.There is no easy way to remove all users. A 'Clear Values' option would be a great addition to Users field type and to other tagged field types.
3
Future consideration
11
VOTE
Merging ideas and Merged ideas filter needs more options
The merging capability does not go far enough. I'd like an option when I merge ideas to 'hide' the merged idea from the portal, counts, and from list views. This would then provide a better count of outstanding ideas by status. Without this abilit...
0
Already exists
2
VOTE
Decouple requirements from Features
Who would benefit? Users of AHA What impact would it make? Allow for my dynamics way of using AHA How should it work? One should be able to create a requirement (or whatever you want to name it) without being forced to link it to a feature. At Roc...
0
Unlikely to implement
7
VOTE
Show only the user's company name in the portal
Whilst an individual may respond to an idea, they are really a representative of their company or a particular team. Some may prefer not to be individually identified ion a public portal. Hence the ability to replace an individuals name with that ...
2
Future consideration
© 2024 Aha! Labs Inc.•All rights reserved