Skip to Main Content

Share your product feedback

ADD A NEW IDEA

Features

Showing 1180 of 9712

Aha should delete the integration link when receiving a delete trigger from a webhook

We have Aha linked to JIRA. When we delete an issue in JIRA, this triggers our Webhook to send a message to Aha. I understand and agree that this should not cause Aha to delete the Feature connected to it for security reasons. But I would expect A...
Marvin van Dongen about 9 years ago in API / Features 8 Future consideration

Default view of Feature / Idea list for team members

You can currently customize your Feature / Idea list and save it. But there's no ability to set this customized view as the default for all team members. This would ensure everyone is looking at the same data with appropriate filters configured an...
Guest about 6 years ago in Features 0 Future consideration

Ability to tie color feature color to other fields

Status doesn't help to organize we would rather color code based on priority. We created a custom field for this and are eventually planning to use scorecards. We would like the ability to tie the color of the feature card to other fields beyond s...
Nick Galassi over 7 years ago in Features 15 Future consideration

Roll up feature delivery risks to parent epics

It would be helpful to have an option to configure roll up for delivery risks. For example, if a feature is at risk, we can reasonably assume the parent epic is also at risk, so we should display the flag there as well- with a link to the relevant...
Reilly O'Connor over 2 years ago in Features 0 Future consideration

Allow custom labels for scorecard metrics

It would be great if, instead of just showing the underlying value, the scorecard metrics could use abstract labels... for example, for an 'effort' metric we might use t-shirt sizes such as "Small", "Medium", "Large" and "X-Large" behind the scene...
Guest almost 10 years ago in Features 6 Future consideration

Rename product value field in non-product workspaces

The product value score terminology works well for workspaces where teams are building products. But in other workspaces it can be confusing. In these cases a more generic field name would be easier to understand.
Austin Merritt over 3 years ago in Features 2 Future consideration

Inherit Field Values from Feature to Requirement

We have a field that exists on both our Features and Requirements, and that custom field is being used in our JIRA integration. When creating a new requirement, it would be great to have the field auto-populate from what is specified in that field...
Guest about 8 years ago in Features 7 Future consideration

Add search capabilities with Google Drive

Today the integration for this feature is not complete. It's not possible to search every document available in G Drive. It should be like this :
Guest over 8 years ago in Features 5 Future consideration

"Type" field for Features shuold be optional

What is the challenge? The “Type” field is mandatory for Features but we don't have a use case for the field. What is the impact? The "Type" field is creating unnecessary noise on the screen every time a Feature request is submitted. D...
Guest 3 months ago in Features 0 Future consideration

Allow setting the Rank of an Initiative from the Initiative detail view

We rely a lot on the rank of Initiatives in order to determine the priority of Initiatives/Epics across the business. Unfortunately, the only way to re-rank Initiatives is by dragging and dropping in the Initiatives list. it would be helpful to ha...
Guest over 7 years ago in Features 3 Future consideration