My ideas: Features
Sort by:
Trending
Status:
Future consideration
Showing 609
6
VOTE
Features workflow board - do not default group by assignee
What is the challenge? My account has hundreds of users. Every time I go to the workflow board, it is grouped by assignee and this is not helpful since I am never looking at this work across all my users (if I ever do, it's just a subset of users ...
2
Future consideration
1
VOTE
Scorecard tool tip windows are too small
What is the challenge? I need to provide appropriate guidance material for the different score values in each scorecard metric. The only area to do this is the "Description" which manifests as a tooltip window. The window is fixed in size and if t...
0
Future consideration
1
VOTE
Allow user be be set to "default unassigned" using automation
What is the challenge? I want to remove me the PM from the assigned field once the work has been sent to my development team, so that the right person can assign themselves. What is the impact? I have to remember to remove me from the field. Descr...
0
Future consideration
8
VOTE
Placeholder feature card with unique styling for planning ahead
What is the challenge? We often know we will have work in future releases which are reliant on other teams to define or which we want to plan to leave space to work on but we don't yet have all the information. We currently write [Placeholder] in ...
0
Future consideration
2
VOTE
Allow Product value scorecard and custom scorecards to be read-only on Prioritization view
What is the challenge? Currently, it is not possible to make the Product value scorecard or a custom scorecards read-only on the Prioritization view. What is the impact? This prevents you from being able to lock-in a scorecard because even if you ...
0
Future consideration
9
VOTE
Support a master choice list across item types (Goals, Initiatives, Epics, Features, Requirements)
Who would benefit? Organizations who need a common choice list custom field that needs to be referenced and consistent across multiple item types. What impact would it make? This would save time, effort and potential for errors How should it work?...
2
Future consideration
106
VOTE
Updating a feature's dates should automatically adjust dates of features with downstream dependencies
What is the challenge? Managing sequential tasks with fixed date offsets can be cumbersome when date changes aren’t automatically applied to downstream dependencies. Currently, only changes made via drag-and-drop on the Releases Overview/Roadmap p...
10
Future consideration
17
VOTE
Priority limit line on subsequent pages of Prioritization view
Love the new prioritization lines introduced last week. However, they can only be placed on the first page. We have a need to also place them on the subsequent pages, as we have that many features to keep track of. We're hoping to use these to als...
2
Future consideration
12
VOTE
Automation of feature to another release based on custom field
Who would benefit? Product Management Team What impact would it make? Ability to cut down on manual work, reducing mistakes and time spent on administrative work How should it work? Under automations, be able to set a rule as such: When a feature ...
2
Future consideration
57
VOTE
Add option to drive Feature progress % by the feature status
The progress % on a feature should be in sync with the status of the feature. When the status changes so should the progress %. Using to-dos, requirements, or estimates to drive the feature progress % isn't an option for us as different groups may...
18
Future consideration