Skip to Main Content
ADD A NEW IDEA

Releases

Showing 447

Workspace name is removed from a sub-release in the Release Gantt

Who would benefit? Those using Roll Up releases What impact would it make? It would improve clarity How should it work? This is really a bug - often when the sub-release is expanded the workspace name is removed. It should persist.
Guest 7 months ago in Releases 0 Future consideration

Add configuration to link a Feature's Release to that of the Epic it is created in.

As a user creating (or integrating) a Feature under an Epic, I want to configure if the Feature will inherit the Epic Release, so that I can automate my Release scope when I create (or integrate from JIRA) a new Feature in an Epic. This will help ...
Guest almost 4 years ago in Releases 1 Future consideration

Release Porfolio -- collapse/expand all for phases and features

Just a suggestion but in the 'Release Portfolio' view it would be great to have a collapse all/view all button that would open all sub phases (and features) to a releases rather than selecting to open/collapse all individually especially when feat...
Suzanne Vaughan over 9 years ago in Releases 2 Future consideration

Having flexibility around Release Dates being either inherited from Rollup release or manually populated

We rely on Rollup releases quite a bit, however, from team's Feature board perspective it's often helpful to track "product" releases info, especially dates and be able to expose those accordingly. At this point, since we're using Roll up releases...
Olga Basman almost 3 years ago in Releases 1 Future consideration

Release date changes - require reason and display on retrospective

Who would benefit? Teams analyzing the changes in a release and needing to understand the factors that contributed to date changes. What impact would it make? Better visibility into challenges or themes to impacts on releases. How should it work? ...
Bonnie Trei 7 months ago in Releases 0 Future consideration

Ability to assign release phase length in working days (vs. start/end date)

When you set a release phase/milestone template, you define by duration (days - which I assume are working days but I'm not certain, they may be absolute) but when you are editing phases of a particular release, that information disappears. I'd lo...
Eva Humphrey about 9 years ago in Releases 1 Future consideration

Ability to create a new release without a release date defined

When you create a new release, you have to populate a release date. Often we create releases ahead of release planning and when dates aren't agreed. By having to populate a release date, this causes confusion as some people think the date is agree...
Julie Edwards almost 2 years ago in Releases 2 Future consideration

Have release status update based on Progress

Who would benefit? Those using releases What impact would it make? Less manual work How should it work? Have an option for Release status to update based on progress of features/epics in the release. The progress can change based on settings, so i...
Guest 7 months ago in Releases 0 Future consideration

Calculate progress based on to-dos AND features

It would be helpful if we had the option to calculate progress on release phases (and releases) based on to-dos AND features together, vs. needing to choose one. For us, release planning is an holistic process that includes both the technical aspe...
Reut Levi over 3 years ago in Releases 0 Future consideration

Possibility to have definition of start and end date for the release

In the create release form there is no start and end date. I think that having the option to define these dates would be more user friendly and help in faster configuring the phases afterwards (their dates).
Dejan Kocic over 6 years ago in Releases 1 Future consideration