AHA! Should share a public version of its roadmap so that users can know what changes/features are planned and when they are planned for
There are plenty of features I wish AHA! would have, and when I look at the ideas portal, some of them say, "likely to implement". What does that mean in terms of timeline? How long of a roadmap does AHA keep? These questions could be answered if ...
Oleg Yazvin
over 6 years ago
in Application
0
Unlikely to implement
I that if you drag something below a priority limit line in a prioritization list report, it pushes something else up above the line. This is unexpected behavior. If I drag a feature/record below the line, then everything else should remain below ...
Todd Meyer
about 1 year ago
in Reports
0
Future consideration
Provide option to only show notifications for @mentions
I need a way to isolate items (initiativies, features, or requirements, etc.) that I have been @mentioned on. Right now, notifications come up for updates to watched items or others I am a participant in. I participate in a LOT of things. I need t...
Calculate initiative progress by feature remaining estimate
Having the ability to calculate the progress of an EPIC based on the linked features remaining estimate is great. This helps provide a very accurate progress based on the work remaining in our feature records. We currently provide progress updates...
Shawn Zenz
about 4 years ago
in Account settings
1
Future consideration
When configuring options for choices, tags, and others, you can change the color for the labels. This currently displays for ideas within Aha!, but not on the Aha! ideas portal. (As of now they are grey default text). I just wanted to put in a req...
Dylan D'Erminio
about 4 years ago
in Ideas portal
0
Future consideration
When reporting on approvals there should be a way to report on "completed by" so that stakeholders can report on features that need approval and that have been approved. Currently there is no way to report on the number of users who have approved.
Travis Davidson
about 4 years ago
in Features
0
Future consideration
Ability to user custom templates to feature type descriptions or requirement descriptions
Who would benefit? my whole org What impact would it make? would allow for us to standardize on feature/requirement description based on the feature type selected when creating a new feature How should it work? When adding a new type, in descripti...
Danny Grigsby
about 1 year ago
in Features
0
Future consideration
Release date changes - require reason and display on retrospective
Who would benefit? Teams analyzing the changes in a release and needing to understand the factors that contributed to date changes. What impact would it make? Better visibility into challenges or themes to impacts on releases. How should it work? ...
Bonnie Trei
about 1 year ago
in Releases
0
Future consideration
Different fields required/visible at different statuses
It would be helpful to have different fields available and/or required at different statuses. So for instance there is certain information that our team wouldn't have/know until they delivered the work. The user would then see/be required to fill ...
Annika Hudson
about 2 years ago
in Features
0
Already exists
Ability to reflect multiple dates per feature on custom roadmaps
On the custom roadmap, although I can create custom date fields which correspond to the delivery dates of multiple platforms of a feature, I don't have the possibility to display them alltogether on Gantt view so as to have an overall view at a gl...
Guest
about 2 years ago
in Features
1
Future consideration