Skip to Main Content

Share your product feedback

ADD A NEW IDEA

Pinned ideas

PINNED Chrome extension to capture feedback from anywhere
What is the challenge? We work in many applications and Aha! can not build custom integrations for all of them. This makes it very hard to users of those applications to capture feedback and store it all in Aha! ideas. What is the impact? This res...

All ideas

Showing 9713

Include Requirements when using AI Draft Release notes from a release

Who would benefit? PMs What impact would it make? Save time from creating a list report How should it work? Using AI Draft Release notes directly from a release doesn't allow you to pull in requirements of features that are contained within that r...
Terence Osmeña almost 2 years ago in Notes 1 Future consideration

Allow epics to inherit prioritisation scores from features

What is the challenge? We prioritise features, not epics. However, it's still useful for many reasons (e.g. reporting) to have a prioritised view of epics as well. There's no way that we will spend the time to score epics separately though. What i...
John P 9 months ago in Epics 0 Future consideration

Integration with Airtable

We're going to start using Aha! on our product team, and we use Airtable for our dev tasks -- would be great to have the ability to connect items in here with tasks/projects/epics in Airtable.
Guest almost 7 years ago in Wanted 5 Future consideration

Allow updating child initiatives based on parent initiative fields in automations

Who would benefit? Those using roll-up initiatives to manage strategic work. What impact would it make? After updating a parent initiative, this would allow users to quickly have child initiatives update with relevant info without having to go thr...
Maria Plotkina over 1 year ago in Automations 0 Future consideration

View in Aha! the author of a comment created in Azure DevOps

In integrations with Azure DevOps, comments created in ADO show the integration name rather than the individual as the creator of the comment when looking at it in Aha!. This can cause confusion for Aha! users who can't easily understand the conte...
Guest over 4 years ago in Integrations 1 Future consideration

Follow custom workspace line terminology when viewing Roll up to workspace goals

When a workspace line references its parent, the naming of that parent should match the parent level, not the workspace level. By not reflecting the customized terminology we are introducing layers of confusion for the team members who don’t spend...
Ian Cooper over 3 years ago in Account settings 1 Future consideration

Allow automations to update records created by the same automation

What is the challenge? Automations can be used to create new to-do, approvals, work-requests, and even requirements on features. It would be helpful to be able to populate certain fields on the newly created records at the same time that they are ...
Chris Quigley 12 months ago in Automations 0 Future consideration

Configure default record link type used when work requests are accepted

What is the challenge? Looking for the ability to request work from other workspaces, but the default record link type is a dependency. What is the impact? Today when a work request is accepted the new record and original record are connected thro...
Kristina Gass 9 months ago in To-dos 0 Future consideration

Support parent-child linking across workspaces and Rally projects through integration.

In the Aha! we have Features that reference a parent Epic in another workspace. In Rally we have portfolio items that are children of a Capability in another project. This cross workspace/project relationship is supported in Aha! and Rally, but th...
Barathi S almost 5 years ago in  1 Future consideration

Estimate in points, but log work in time

My agile development team uses story points for estimation. Once work is in progress, I want my developers to log work in time. This helps me understand where their time is going, and to inform future estimates for planning.
Jeff Tucker almost 4 years ago in Capacity planning / Delivery 1 Unlikely to implement