Provide alternative way to match users when email address is not exposed in Jira
Some time ago, Atlassian made changes that requires users to share their email addresses on an individual user profile setting. When that option is not checked, Aha! is not able to view their email address and if assigned user is mapped, is not ab...
Madeleine Black
8 months ago
in Jira
1
Future consideration
Allow integrations such as Jira at the Product Line level
Integrations may be common across products within the same product line. It would save time and the possibility to make setup mistakes if these integrations can be setup one level higher
Guest
about 1 year ago
in Jira
0
Future consideration
Currently, as far as I am aware, the only way to use Components from Jira is to add a custom field in Aha! and map them. This works OK, however if a new component is added in Jira you have to manually add it to Aha! as an option to select. Please ...
Guest
about 2 months ago
in Jira
0
Future consideration
When setting up an integration, it would be helpful to have a way to be prompted to map required fields in Jira. Currently, it is possible to create an integration that does not have field mappings for required fields in Jira. This causes the inte...
Madeleine Black
8 months ago
in Jira
1
Future consideration
Do not allow requirements to be mapped without a Links To relationship set
It is possible to create an integration where you have requirements mapped to a Jira record type, and where you have no Links To relationship established to a parent record in Aha! This results in import errors where requirements cannot be importe...
Madeleine Black
8 months ago
in Jira
0
Future consideration
The log file currently reports on Jira tickets that are out of scope for the integration (e.g., bugs, stories, tasks) as defined by the integration template. These log entries typically end with "No changes made in Aha!" If I'm trying to find the ...
Sandy Kobayashi
3 months ago
in Jira
0
Future consideration
Presently, there isn't a way to have requirements in a draft status like there are with features. This tends to be somewhat problematic when you have multiple requirements types you work with e.g. subtasks and user stories. It will automatically s...
I R
about 1 month ago
in Jira
0
Future consideration
Aha now honors additional Jira Types (other than just Stories and Features) - YAY! However, when the Jira Type is changed, it breaks the sync between the Jira item and Aha item.
Example: Support reports a "Support Defect", Dev reviews, changes i...
Kathy Landon
almost 5 years ago
in Jira
10
Future consideration
Allow Mapping of Requirement Type from Jira to Aha!
Presently, you can map types for items at the Feature level and this syncs between Jira and Aha! without issue if the item type changes in Jira; However, the issue that we are facing is that because there's no mapping between Jira and Aha! for req...
I R
about 1 month ago
in Jira
0
Future consideration
Map Jira's "Won't Fix" resolution status to Aha!s "Won't implement" status
When the Jira workflow is set up to "Close" a ticket with the resolution status of "won't fix," there currently is now way to map that against the Aha workflow.
It would be great to also access the Resolution status from Jira to handle this c...
Guest
over 7 years ago
in Jira
17
Future consideration