Skip to Main Content

Share your product feedback

ADD A NEW IDEA

Integrations

Showing 960 of 9290

Keep features in sync when they cross areas in Azure DevOps

This is useful when you have your DevOps areas configured by team. Once the features are pushed from Aha! to DevOps and evaluated by the team they need to be moved into the area for the appropriate team. Any team can work on any feature based on a...
Deb Gay almost 6 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Map custom release field in Jira integration

Currently the Jira integration doesn't allow users to map the custom release field, on records like features. We would like to be able to map this field and ideally to map it with a custom versions field in Jira. The two fields should be able to m...
Diane Metzger 5 months ago in Jira 0 Future consideration

Clubhouse integration

Clubhouse is gaining a full head of steam and being adopted widely as a replacement for Trello and Jira - it strikes a great balance between the two. We're currently evaluating a move from PivotalTracker to Clubhouse, and while we're excited by th...
Guest over 7 years ago in Wanted 9 Will not implement

Add support to map Azure Boolean Fields to Aha

This request is to support the mapping of ADO boolean fields to Aha predefined droplist and tag fields. Currently, Azure DevOps Boolean fields (true/false) cannot be mapped to Aha fields. Rather, in ADO, you need to create a field as a picklist in...
Jerrold Emery about 3 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Adjust sync direction for URL fields in integration mappings

What is the challenge? When a URL custom field is referenced within field mappings of an integration, it can not be set to update from the integrated system to Aha! only from Aha! to the integrated system. What is the impact? We can not adjust dir...
Kristina Gass 8 months ago in Integrations 1 Future consideration

Import items even if a parent is not available due to security restrictions

What is the challenge? Some of our work items (e.g. a feature) in ADO are linked to security related parents (e.g. an epic) in ADO. We are not able to access the parent work item due to these security settings. However we would like to see the fea...
Tobias Getz 3 months ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

When using Import Records, not retaining parent/child relationship (AzDo Integration)

Who would benefit? Aha users when setting up a new workspace What impact would it make? Improves ability to only bring in needed records How should it work? After setting up integration mappings with parent/child relationships, have import records...
Guest about 1 year ago in Integrations 1 Future consideration

Allow record mapping to Asana Projects

Asana best practices recommend projects represent distinct bodies of work with start and end dates. The Aha! integration requires, in the set up, selection of an Asana Project to connect the workspace to. This requires a new integration for every ...
Bonnie Trei about 3 years ago in Asana 0 Future consideration

Map VSTS/TFS picklist custom fields to Aha! choice list fields

VSTS/TFS picklist custom fields are treated as strings and cannot support option mappings. Mapping a picklist field to an Aha! choice list field should provide the option to click Configure and map the choices.
Tessa Adair about 6 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 9 Future consideration

Epic progress doesn't update when it has children in different projects

Who would benefit? Customer using Jira epics to manage work in multiple projects What impact would it make? They would be able to see their progress in Aha! correctly How should it work? If you have an epic in Project A, and it has multiple childr...
Kyle d'Oliveira about 1 year ago in Jira 0 Future consideration