Reviewer users should be able to change a feature's (or requirement's) up to a certain point
For example, We may have our engineering team (or QA team) in Aha! as "reviewers" and we would like them to participate in escalating status - such as: Engineer would say "In Development" when they start, and "Development Complete" when done. Then...
Guest
about 10 years ago
in Features
3
Will not implement
Updating Feature Release when Fix Version of an Epic in Jira is made
As a user of Jira, we update the Fix Version of Epics. This does not reflect in Aha! in the Release unless we also add some data in another field such as description. This is very frustrating for users of Jira and Aha! as they should be able to up...
Guest
about 5 years ago
in Features
1
Already exists
As we evolve towards a continuous workflow, the concept of the Release becomes redundant. Yes, there should be a difference between Deployment and Release, but we still want to Release at the Feature level, if possible. So requiring Features to be...
Max Cascone
over 7 years ago
in Features
0
Unlikely to implement
I use the My Work > Features to identify whay my company needs me to work on but the current view is very hard to see. It's a massive screen of white and small lines of blue. It's very tedious to look through.
Guest
over 2 years ago
in Features
0
Future consideration
When editing or viewing a feature for example then selecting the release "tab" a completely different release appears. Meaning you have to find and select the correct one each time. Selections should maintain the context across tabs as you usually...
Dave Tucker
over 7 years ago
in Features
0
Unlikely to implement
In feature allow link to open master feature (capability) directly from request and also show the master feature/capability number
For the capability link in the feature, allow it to be a hyperlink to open the master feature capability. Also it would be nice to see the number of the master feature capability instead of having to know what the title of it is to select it from ...
Jodie Carson
about 5 years ago
in Features
2
Already exists
It would be helpful if you could order the features in the feature board based on the order of master features within a release. If you work primarily with master features, having to order also order the features after the master features are orde...
Chad Esplin
over 2 years ago
in Features
0
Future consideration
It would be nice to have a way to add static data/info that shows up in every feature, idea, etc., possibly determined by layout. For example, our teams need to access a document on SharePoint while they review their features. We'd like to be able...
Guest
about 5 years ago
in Features
0
Already exists
As a user, it would be very convenient if I could upload a file with the same name as an already attached file, and instead of creating a second attachment with the same name, it would create a v2 of the attachment. When clicking on the attachment...
Guest
almost 8 years ago
in Features
1
Unlikely to implement