Include linked record/relationship field as an option for automated scorecard metrics
It would be valuable to be able to include standard fields that are derived from linked records in automated scorecard metrics. For example, I may want to create a metric that assigns a score based on the name of the goal(s) that a feature is asso...
Brittany Rhoney
about 2 years ago
in Features
2
Future consideration
As business needs change a Feature that seemed obvious to add to a release pipeline may get tabled based on new information and based on more information may need to be demoted. Even though Features can be bulk moved to Ideas the ability to easily...
Aaron Bawcom
almost 11 years ago
in Features
8
Future consideration
Scorecard automated metric should allow you to select other scorecard fields
We have implemented two separate scorecards for feature cost and feature impact. This gives us more flexibility in reporting/filtering based on what-ifs. We would like to combine those two scores in an an overall feature score to use for prioritiz...
Rich Baldry
about 3 years ago
in Features
0
Future consideration
Multiple users editing a priority list should be reflected across all users.
What is the challenge?
There is no single source of truth when multiple users have a priority list open. Multiple product managers are editing a single priority list and changes such as moving the red priority line are not updated in real time. ...
Claire A
4 months ago
in Features
0
Future consideration
Ability to move features into already-shipped releases
I'd like a way to easily move a feature into an already-shipped release. Right now, the Release dropdown for a feature only displays active releases. To move one in this case (let's say the Aha backlog somehow got out of sync with our dev tracker ...
Christina Landry
almost 7 years ago
in Features
2
Future consideration
Allow features to be grouped by epic in feature board and feature workflow
Currently, there is no grouping available in feature board. In feature workflow, it is possible to group by assignee. It would be great to be able to group both views by epic.
Joao Tornovsky
about 4 years ago
in Features
0
Future consideration
Aha! allows you to create feature workflows for a product, but not for a feature type. It would be helpful to have product workflows applicable beyond the product - allowing users to customize completion workflows per feature type.
Let's look at ...
Max Chanoch
over 10 years ago
in Features
4
Future consideration
It's currently possible to create a new release in a new workspace that is a copy of a release in another workspace, which will also copy all of the features within that release. If I need to copy a single feature to a new workspace, though, I hav...
Finn Meyer
about 3 years ago
in Features
1
Future consideration
Very similar to APP-I-2199 I want to be able to group custom fields into distinct groups. For example I have a section that is all dates controlled by our development team. I would like to take those fields and group them together into one section...
Guest
over 9 years ago
in Features
1
Already exists
Teams can inherit delivery risk settings from the team line.
One can set delivery risk settings on the team line but these appear to have no effect. It would be nice to have teams be able to set their delivery risk settings to inherit from their team line, similar to how card customizations are intended to ...
Paul C
over 2 years ago
in Features
0
Future consideration