That we can only have End-to-Start Dependencies drawn is causing issues with our program Overviews. Our Managers are concerned by all of the red. Please enable us to also include Start-to-Start Dependencies, and Start-to-End Dependencies. If we ca...
Guest
over 2 years ago
in Features
4
Future consideration
Allow feature boards to show releases and their features across multiple products
This would allow for an easy view that can be used to review and prioritize features, especially when features across multiple products have dependencies. Viewing and filtering multiple releases from different products in the same features board w...
Guest
over 5 years ago
in Features
2
Future consideration
Scorecard automated metric should allow you to select other scorecard fields
We have implemented two separate scorecards for feature cost and feature impact. This gives us more flexibility in reporting/filtering based on what-ifs. We would like to combine those two scores in an an overall feature score to use for prioritiz...
Rich Baldry
about 2 years ago
in Features
0
Future consideration
Prioritization Report - Allow more than one level of record structure
On the feature prioritization report, under the “edit columns” option, when I select “+ Add records related to this epic” it returns a blank list. I’d like to add initiatives to this list. This is needed when Epics are linked to Initiatives, but n...
Evan Hollohan
9 months ago
in Features
0
Future consideration
Improve function to move requirement between features
What is the challenge? Unable to move multiple requirements between two features without closing og re-opening the feature I am moving requiremts from. The feature I am moving requirements to is gone from the selection meny when I try to move the ...
Guest
3 months ago
in Features
1
Future consideration
We have a field that exists on both our Features and Requirements, and that custom field is being used in our JIRA integration. When creating a new requirement, it would be great to have the field auto-populate from what is specified in that field...
Guest
about 7 years ago
in Features
6
Future consideration
It would be great if, instead of just showing the underlying value, the scorecard metrics could use abstract labels... for example, for an 'effort' metric we might use t-shirt sizes such as "Small", "Medium", "Large" and "X-Large" behind the scene...
Guest
almost 9 years ago
in Features
6
Future consideration
Allow Drill-in for Feature columns on Prioritization view
Who would benefit? Users sharing Prioritization views via shared webpage What impact would it make? Increase ease of use for drill-in functionality by enabling the function on the default columns How should it work? The default Feature Name column...
Stephanie Lechner
about 1 year ago
in Features
0
Future consideration
Rename product value field in non-product workspaces
The product value score terminology works well for workspaces where teams are building products. But in other workspaces it can be confusing. In these cases a more generic field name would be easier to understand.
Austin Merritt
over 2 years ago
in Features
1
Future consideration