After I ship a release and move features to a later release, I want to see what release my feature was supposed to ship in, so I can understand how well we are hitting our release targets so we can plan future releases better. It should be an edit...
Michael Gillis
about 4 years ago
in Releases
0
Future consideration
The Gantt charts are great for planning out work, but we often need to show them to clients. In this situation, an automatically generated ID that often bears no relationship to the order in which it's being executed doesn't add any value and can ...
Guest
over 5 years ago
in Releases
0
Future consideration
As a Product Manager, I would like be able to capture feature estimates without having the release capacity feature. I don't track capacity at the release level -- at least not in the way Aha! seems to work today. I manage my capacity across all p...
Tom Beck
over 8 years ago
in Releases
1
Unlikely to implement
I love it how Aha! does great work with communication when the user has "emotionally loaded" moments, such as Shipping a product. There, for instance, when the user is shipping the product, Aha gives a message:
"Good work. Every feature in this r...
Guest
almost 10 years ago
in Releases
0
Unlikely to implement
Toggle 'Off' Automatic Inclusion of features to Releases Gantt
I use the gantt to plot release phases and don't always include features in that process. Automatically including every new feature on the releases gantt can be tedious manual removal process after the fact. I would prefer to add features to my ga...
Adam T
over 5 years ago
in Releases
0
Future consideration
It's a rare thing that we are managing releases daily in Aha (as we ship in Jira). Therefore when we go to ship a release in Aha, defaulting to todays date is a bit annoying, especially when the external release date is already correct. We therefo...
Jason Hollis
over 4 years ago
in Releases
0
Future consideration
In the Release Roadmap, allow user stories / phases to be dragged up or down instead of the current inability to re-shuffle the order items are listed in
The Release roadmap would be much enhanced by the added flexibility to move items around, and it would make editing the release roadmap to showcase shifting timelines/priorities much simpler.
Guest
about 7 years ago
in Releases
0
Will not implement
allow epics and features to be independently defined, then attached to a release
currently, you must define a release first, and though you could use placeholders releases, you can’t create epic’s without having them be in a release……seems unnecessarily restrictive, why can’t Epics be created independently of release, then ass...
Guest
over 4 years ago
in Releases
0
Future consideration
Remove 'Will not implement' releases from active releases
I added a new status to the releases workflow, "Abandoned" and set the status to "Will not implement". However, these releases are still showing in release drop-downs in the active section. I need to scroll through them every time I use the drop-d...
Melissa Johnson
over 7 years ago
in Releases
2
Future consideration
With Phases/Milestones, the only way to report off multiple workspaces is by having names listed with identical spelling, this limits the ability to clearly say what is happening in a phase without screwing up reports. Is there any thoughts on bei...
Scott Barnes
almost 3 years ago
in Releases
0
Future consideration