Multiple Dependency Definitions appear in Gantt Chart Report
Today within the Gantt Chart view, the only Dependency Type that appears to be captured is "Dependent On" or "Dependency Of". This neglects other dependency types. All types should be included in this view
Josh Tambor
almost 5 years ago
in Dependencies / Reports
0
Future consideration
If a new workflow is applied to a workspace, update any affected Automation rules
When you select a new status workflow for a workspace (any record type) it forces you to remap existing statuses to the new statuses. We should also update any automations to use the new statuses using the mapping the user selected when changing t...
Todd Meyer
almost 5 years ago
in Application
0
Future consideration
We are building out Models & Positioning Templates for our Teams to use that will reference the different Competitor & Persona Profiles but with no way to actually link the records.
Templates only allow you to add blank component sections...
Guest
almost 6 years ago
in Strategy
0
Future consideration
Resource capacity leveling for individuals and Teams
Add leveling options for as soon as possible (front loaded), Level across the duration, As late as possible (back loaded), and Manual. Currently, leveling is only front loaded which makes it difficult to manage a resource who spends 10% on support...
Gary Fitzgerald
almost 4 years ago
in Ideas
1
Future consideration
Regarding Capacity Planning, we’d like to understand what can fit in an entire quarter and break down the deliveries monthly but some will be bigger items will not fit in each month and sit across a few. Therefore having monthly capacities is hard...
Guest
almost 4 years ago
in Releases
0
Future consideration
Ability to add new records and search a custom table all from one screen.
Today, you can go to Product-> Custom Tables to Add but you can't search across the pages there. You can also create a list report with a filter to search BUT you can't add a new customer to that custom table from there. It would be useful to b...
Guest
almost 6 years ago
in Account settings
1
Future consideration
Dependencies - updates at any level or record type should automatically update downstream records.
Records that are dependent on other records should be updated accordingly when the upstream record is changed. Dates changing on upstream records should automatically adjust all downstream dependencies. We understand that not everybody will want t...
Guest
almost 5 years ago
in Dependencies
2
Future consideration
allow a scorecard to count the number of tags in a field and incorporate that into the score
This is a spin-off to the ideas that request that "custom fields" be incorporate-able into a score. It would be great if it wasn't just hard-entered integers, but anything that could be counted.
For example, we use a tag field to indicate which of...
Oleg Yazvin
almost 6 years ago
in Epic
2
Future consideration
On the feature board, in the small card size view, adding feature type icons would make it a much better view for getting an idea of what's going on in a release. Would be a nice alternative to text description of feature for the large card size v...
Suzanne Vaughan
almost 10 years ago
in Backlogs
0
Future consideration
Can we add the "Products" field to this list of custom fields supported for integration?
We have created a custom field named "Product" which is of type "Products Field". In our Jira 2.0 integration, we want to map this field to a Jira field called "Component/s". We can see "Component/s" on the Jira side but the "Product" field is not...
Guest
almost 7 years ago
in Features
1
Already exists