Skip to Main Content
ADD A NEW IDEA

FILTER BY CATEGORY

My ideas: Azure DevOps Services and Server

Showing 91 of 7820

Ability to refresh data from the development tool for a single Aha record

Sometimes I'd just like to fix a record or two that have gotten out of sync. When I click on the Integrations menu for a particular feature, I have the option to resend all fields to my development tool (Aha -> ADO), or, to delete the link. IDE...
Kim Bremer 4 days ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0

Configurable unit of time for Estimation field

We're using Aha with Azure DevOps integration. We’ve mapped the Estimate field in Aha with an estimate field in Azure DevOps. Our estimation process is basically as follows: * Product Manager creates Feature in Aha * Product Manager send ...
Guest over 4 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server  / Capacity planning 10 Likely to implement

Allow attachments to Feature comments to be integrated to Azure DevOps

When you add comments to a Feature, and you have integration with Azure DevOps (ADO) configured, you can have these comments passed back and forth. Unfortunately if you attach a file to a comment it will not get passed between Aha and ADO. When yo...
Guest over 2 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Configurable destination of imported features

As a product manager, I should have control over the destination of where imported features and epics go so that they are in the release or parking lot where they belong. Today, the destination of imported items seems almost up to chance although ...
Tom Beck about 5 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 9 Future consideration

DevOps Integration -- Support rendering of images embedded in description field

Currently when you import from Azure DevOps, if you have images embedded into the description field, they come over as a link in the Aha! description field, e.g. imagename.png. It would be great if they would render in Aha! like they do in DevOps....
Mike Maylone almost 3 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 8 Future consideration

Add 2-way integration mapping for release start and end dates

Release start date can currently only be mapped 1-way from Aha! to Jira (or any development system.) This is because that date used to be calculated based on features and phases in the release. Now that this date is set manually, it should be poss...
Austin Merritt about 3 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server  / Integrations / Jira / Rally 1 Future consideration

Map VSTS/TFS picklist custom fields to Aha! choice list fields

VSTS/TFS picklist custom fields are treated as strings and cannot support option mappings. Mapping a picklist field to an Aha! choice list field should provide the option to click Configure and map the choices.
Tessa Adair over 4 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 9 Future consideration

Better presentation of text when integrating to an existing field in ADO

Sometimes, the feature in ADO already exists, and I want to link it to a feature in Aha. When I do this, I'm presented with an un-readable HTML output of the description fields, making is pretty much impossible to actually see the differences. See...
Jake Hawkes about 2 months ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Include author of comment from Azure DevOps when saving to Aha

We use the Aha <-> Azure DevOps integration. Comments from Aha include the author when synced to AzDO (Comment added by <user> in Aha! - View). The reverse is not true. Comments made in AzDO that come to Aha do not say the other, just ...
Guest 2 months ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Allow a single Azure DevOps webhook to support updates across multiple Aha! integrations

With Jira, a single Aha! webhook added at the system level supports updates across all Aha! integrations. This makes scaling integrations simple as after the first setup, a user never has to add another webhook. With Azure DevOps (TFS), ea...
Guest almost 4 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 1 Future consideration