I would like to see better mapping between statuses. For example when someone closes a case in Fogbugz, it automatically updates the Aha feature as 'will not implement' - I would like it to be set as 'Ready to ship' instead
Further to this, I would like to see a cross-reference link back to Aha within the case that is generated in Fogbugz. That way, an engineer in Fogbugz can easily refer to the linked information in the Aha feature (and the context around it).
I would actually like real 2-way integration (right now the only FB->Aha integration is pushing back status). This would make a big difference to us because I'd really like our Product people to "live" in Aha, and the Engineering to "live" in Fogbugz. With the current integration that is not possible. If our engineers update the case notes, or ask questions etc, these are not pushed into Aha - which necessitates the product folk needing to long to FB and deal with that interface.
I would like to see better mapping between statuses. For example when someone closes a case in Fogbugz, it automatically updates the Aha feature as 'will not implement' - I would like it to be set as 'Ready to ship' instead
Further to this, I would like to see a cross-reference link back to Aha within the case that is generated in Fogbugz. That way, an engineer in Fogbugz can easily refer to the linked information in the Aha feature (and the context around it).
I would actually like real 2-way integration (right now the only FB->Aha integration is pushing back status). This would make a big difference to us because I'd really like our Product people to "live" in Aha, and the Engineering to "live" in Fogbugz. With the current integration that is not possible. If our engineers update the case notes, or ask questions etc, these are not pushed into Aha - which necessitates the product folk needing to long to FB and deal with that interface.
any update to timeframe on this? I'd really like it too... shouldn't be too complicated since integration is done already.