Who would benefit? |
Organizations that need to ensure that a large group of users link records together in a consistent way for roll up reporting. |
What impact would it make? |
Improved data quality by providing a narrow selection of possible goals and initiatives an initiative/release/epic/feature could be linked to. |
How should it work? |
A couple of potential options:
|
I agree with Linda's point on being able to filter initiatives. In our case, we would like to prevent users from being able to associate objects to initiatives that are in statuses like "Will not do" or "Closed". This is not currently possible.
To enable users to pick the correct initiative when assigning against an epic, it would be useful to filter the initiatives in the results to only show those linked to the goal for selection.
Equally, when goals and initiatives have been set to abandoned or no longer being used, these too should be suppressed from any results when creating new records but kept for historic purposes against previous work.