Skip to Main Content

Share your product feedback

ADD A NEW IDEA

Azure DevOps Services and Server

Showing 94

New features created via an ADO integration are assigned to the parent epic release by default

Key problem: the "Parent" field in ADO can contain only one value. In ADO, a feature is automatically associated to the same theme as its' parent epic, but in Aha! this is not the case. So when features import, we associate them with the correct p...
Bryan McElhinney over 2 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Handle multi-select fields in ADO integration

What is the challenge? Running into an issue where multi-select from Aha can't flow over to ADO multi-select field. Only first value flows over from Aha. What is the impact? Can't use multi-select field in ADO properly. Describe your idea Allow fo...
Alex Berestenko 7 months ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Update the Feature % Complete field based on User Stories of the DevOps Feature

Update the Feature % Complete field based on User Stories of the DevOps Feature that is linked to the Aha Feature. The Software Product Plan does just that! In DevOps, this information is a calculated field, which can be easily configured in Board...
Guest about 2 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 2 Future consideration

Control how Estimates are converted and sent to TFS/VSTS

The default behaviour of how the TFS/VSTS integration sends time Estimates in minutes is very limiting. I don't know any agile team that would be estimating Features or Requirements down to minutes, so it doesn't make sense for the integration to ...
Guest almost 7 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 1 Future consideration

Integration to Azure DevOps for teams capacity planning

We would like to use Points based capacity planning but it needs to be integrated with (in our case) Azure DevOps which is where the team is committed to and working on work. All of our Features and Master Features (Epics) in Aha are calculated ba...
Heath McCarthy over 4 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 2 Future consideration

Option to enable "bypassRules" for Azure DevOps integrations

What is the challenge? ADO projects can have work items rules in place that prevent the Aha integration from working. For example, the ADO state transitions may be restricted by values in other fields. What is the impact? In order to prevent the r...
David I. 8 months ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Allow linking of Features and Releases to a specific DevOps Iteration Level

We use a more granular structure to the Iterations in DevOps so mapping items to just the top level is not really suitable to keep a feature synchronized correctly and could involve a lot of manual changes at the beginning and end of a release. Fo...
Dave Ball over 4 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 2 Future consideration

Sync Release Phase to Azure DevOps

We have adopted a SAFe framework where features are planned quarterly. As a result we are creating 'Releases' in Aha that are materializing these quarters. Within a quarter we may deploy the software multiple times and we are using release phases ...
Nicolas Andrillon over 3 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Provide item ranking capability with Azure DevOps integration to Boards

Currently the Azure DevOps Boards integration does not include the capability to share the rank order of items in a workspace which results in the items in the Azure Devops Boards workflow having a different ordering than the items in the Aha rele...
Guest over 3 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Warn user of integration on epic deletion

Who would benefit? Integration users What impact would it make? How should it work? When you delete a feature which is linked to a dev system you get a warning (attached). When you delete an epic, you do not get a consitent warning. This suggestio...
Tom Bailey over 1 year ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration