Allow for a check list to be copied to the GitHub product AND not change the check list in the originating work activity.
The check list (versus ordered / unordered list) in the text field is very nice. However, integration process translates the Check List to an unordered list in GitHub and then updates that back to the originating work activity. This process change...
Guest
over 5 years ago
in GitHub
0
Future consideration
Mockups are being sent to github as links, opening the image externally, instead of showing them directly in the issue. Prepending the link with an exclamation mark would show the mockup inside the github issue, a much useful approach.
Current mo...
Guest
almost 7 years ago
in GitHub
4
Already exists
In GitHub integration, we would like to map a custom field called "Repository" to a static value that is identical for all issues from the one GitHub integration. That way we could then show the value as a label and also filter by it in feature vi...
Guest
over 3 years ago
in GitHub
0
Future consideration
We typically reference feature requests by the Aha feature ID, e.g. WEB-32 or WEB-44. When we push those feature requests down to Github for development, we generally create a branch for each issue, but since we lose this information it's difficul...
David Bean
almost 8 years ago
in GitHub
2
Unlikely to implement
If you add Github Issues integration with a Github account that requires 2-factor authentication, the integration fails. It would be good to support this.
From the release details, on the integrations, allow sending (and re-sending) all features in the release to GitHub.
Currently, one needs to manually send each individual feature to GitHub when starting a new release, which can take a really long...
Tiago Sousa
about 5 years ago
in GitHub
2
Already exists
Our QA team has a hard time seeing the story of a ticket due to all of commit messages. It would be nice if instead of appearing as just comments the Github commits appeared separately or were able to be be filtered out.
Guest
almost 6 years ago
in GitHub
0
Future consideration
GitHub Commit Hook shouldn't add commenting user as a watcher (or shouldn't run as user)
When the GitHub Commit Hook is run, it adds me (the user who created the integration) as a watcher on whatever features are referenced. This becomes a huge notification nightmare pretty quickly.
It would be great if the comments on features as a ...
Guest
almost 6 years ago
in GitHub
0
Future consideration
Ability to pull data from public repositories on Github
As an open source company, we track hundreds of projects hosted by Github, many of which we do not own or administer.
We would benefit from a Github integration that allows us to track public Github repositories. There is no need to update the rep...
Guest
about 6 years ago
in GitHub
0
Will not implement
Change GIT Integration to Separate from Human Comments
Right now all GIT commits (with task IDs) are populating the human comments. Ideally, this would be in a separate list, so there's not so much noise in the comments.
Guest
about 6 years ago
in GitHub
1
Unlikely to implement