What is the challenge? I work in a G suite company where all my work funnels those tools. What is the impact? I do not check or follow-up on Aha! to-dos because I don't have regular visibility. Describe your idea Allow a two-way integration betwee...
Guest
10 months ago
in Wanted
0
Future consideration
Please enable the ability to sync a release phase to an Epic in Jira. And also sync release phase To-Dos to tasks in Jira. Use Case: I have a release template with my release phase and associated to-dos. These to-dos are what govern my Jira tasks....
Guest
almost 5 years ago
in Jira
0
Future consideration
Ability to map an initiatives "assigned to" field with a user field within an integration
When mapping an initiative to a record in a development tool, it would be helpful to have the ability to map the "assigned to" field from Aha! to a user field. This would be helpful when initiatives are mapped to EPICs so the assigned user can syn...
Shawn Zenz
almost 6 years ago
in Integrations
1
Future consideration
Support an integration with BetterWorks to sync goals, success metrics and initiatives
As a company adopting a next generation performance management system anchored in the concept of Objectives and Key Results I would like to synchronize Aha goals, success metrics and initiatives with BetterWorks (www.betterworks.com)
Note: both Be...
Guest
about 9 years ago
in Integrations
0
Unlikely to implement
If a comment is deleted in Jira, please delete that comment in Aha! also
Some comments are for testing purposes or are not correct. If we have decided to delete a comment from an epic or story in Jira, we would like it to be removed from the feature in Aha! as well.
Kelly Sebes
over 7 years ago
in Jira
1
Will not implement
Dependency Relationship Removed does not Update Aha or vice versa
What is the challenge? If a dependency relationship is removed in Azure DevOps, it does not remove it in Aha. If a dependency relationship is removed in Aha, it does not remove it in Azure DevOps. What is the impact? Have to go to both systems to ...
Guest
10 months ago
in Integrations
0
Future consideration
Account Admins have the ability to configure the account level Integration record mappings
Issue? The default Rally integration record mappings are Feature / Release / Requirement. Every new integration is being given the three record default which is confusing Aha users and enables users to deviate from the best practice of feature to ...
Mike Jacobson
over 2 years ago
in Rally
0
Future consideration
Allow multiple Aha! accounts to integrate with the same Salesforce instance
In my organization we have separate Aha! accounts for each business unit. We use one Salesforce instance across our organization. I would like to be able to integrate our multiple Aha! accounts with our Salesforce instance.
Erin Ward
over 2 years ago
in Salesforce
0
Future consideration
Set the TFS Iteration and Area path per feature or requirement
Having a single area path for the entire product doesn't make sense. This value will usually depend on the feature, as area paths define the area of code impacted by a work item. This helps with evaluating code churn and test coverage. It needs to...
Jonathon Leeke
about 10 years ago
in Integrations
6
Already exists
In Aha!, if you have enabled 'Delivery risks', one of the things you can do is manually set a flag on a Feature (or Epic or Requirement). In Jira, you can also 'Flag' issues similarly. Aha!: https://www.aha.io/support/roadmaps/strategic-roadmaps/c...
Mat Buehler
over 2 years ago
in Jira
1
Future consideration