I've recently started to use requirements within features more - and see them as a good way to clear a lot of unnecessary detail from feature overviews / reports. However to change a large number of features into requirements is a slow one-by-one ...
Guest
about 9 years ago
in Features
4
Already exists
Don't Default Time Estimates to Reflect Start on and Due on Dates When Feature is displayed on the Releases Roadmap View
If you try to clear a feature estimate and the feature is already added to the roadmap, then it fills in the value of the estimate duration automatically to reflect the start on and due on dates. This means that if you try to plan a release and th...
Matt Case
about 9 years ago
in Features
1
Already exists
Create Folders in the "attach documents" section on each project
Hi, I'm a big one for attaching documents to my projects. Some projects are starting to look a little messy now with the number of files attached. It would be good to be able to create folders to store the files in i.e. a folder for gate 1 and ano...
Guest
about 9 years ago
in Features
1
Will not implement
Show related or dependent features indented beneath parent feature in Features Board
Hi there,
Like many, we are trying to find the right balance of granularity and manageability for our features. Managing the roadmap and backlog is much easier with multiple features than with the requirements under a feature, since the requiremen...
Guest
about 9 years ago
in Features
1
Unlikely to implement
Capacity for teams: Bulk change how estimates are calculated
This idea relates to capacity planning for teams. You currently have to manually set initiatives or master features to compute from a child record. It would be so great if we could make this change in bulk.
Ability to user custom templates to feature type descriptions or requirement descriptions
Who would benefit? my whole org What impact would it make? would allow for us to standardize on feature/requirement description based on the feature type selected when creating a new feature How should it work? When adding a new type, in descripti...
Danny Grigsby
about 1 year ago
in Features
0
Future consideration
the notes feature, with the ability to a feature hashtag, is really promising. however, the link to the feature doesn't seem to be shown anywhere on the feature.
ideally, you'd add a note - maybe about visit to a client, mention that they had fee...
Guest
over 9 years ago
in Features
1
Already exists
Aha! data model support for actual features / components / themes, rather merely work output
Currently the "features" and "master features" relate to work output, not actual product concepts that users care about.
tl;dr; please give us more ways to separate concepts from the actual work. Features should technically be conceptual, and shou...
Guest
almost 6 years ago
in Features
0
Future consideration
Allow for Features to Integrate with Multiple Epics
We have multiple teams working on multiple Epics in JIRA that all track to a single Feature. It would be very helpful to enable integration of a Feature to multiple JIRA items.
Cindy Datlof
over 4 years ago
in Features
4
Already exists