The ability to re-arrange the information on the related tab would be very useful. Linked records can grow incredibly long. Having other fields at the top would be incredibly useful.
Guest
almost 2 years ago
in Features
3
Future consideration
What is the challenge? For data quality, we want to notify an Epic/Feature creator when then have forgotten to tie the record to an Initiative, Objective, or Key Result What is the impact? Work that should be tied to these is not visible, monitore...
Lorena Connolly
8 months ago
in Features
0
Future consideration
As a PO my view of the work has a farther horizon than the dev team. To sketch a plan, using the capacity tools, I need a way to put in an initial estimate of the work. This is a tactic I've used for years and call a PO Estimate, and after a certa...
Aaron Kremin
about 6 years ago
in Features
2
Future consideration
Include ranking number on the feature/initiative card
We need the rank number to be visible in the board view/initiatives strategy view where the stacked ranking is done. If you have a lot of items to prioritize/rank you currently have to switch back and forth to a list report view to see what their ...
Allow start and due dates to be set to a specific date in automation rule actions
It appears that right now, the actions available in automation rules when updating a date field (Start and due dates in particular) are all relative to the current date (e.g. set to 1 month from the current date, set to 1 week from the current dat...
Gene Lewin
almost 2 years ago
in Features
6
Future consideration
Aha! allows you to create feature workflows for a product, but not for a feature type. It would be helpful to have product workflows applicable beyond the product - allowing users to customize completion workflows per feature type.
Let's look at ...
Max Chanoch
almost 10 years ago
in Features
4
Future consideration
Very similar to APP-I-2199 I want to be able to group custom fields into distinct groups. For example I have a section that is all dates controlled by our development team. I would like to take those fields and group them together into one section...
Guest
about 9 years ago
in Features
1
Already exists
Prioritization Report - Allow more than one level of record structure
On the feature prioritization report, under the “edit columns” option, when I select “+ Add records related to this epic” it returns a blank list. I’d like to add initiatives to this list. This is needed when Epics are linked to Initiatives, but n...
Evan Hollohan
12 months ago
in Features
0
Future consideration