Application
Sort by:
Trending
Status:
Showing 7570
19
VOTE
I need a way to compare versions of Features/Requirements in a Release
Before pushing a release to Jira, we do reviews of Features/Requirements with engineering. This may happen several times and we end up with multiple versions of the Release details. This makes it hard to compare the difference between the old and ...
2
Already exists
2
VOTE
Allow global initiative rank on strategic roadmaps
Who would benefit? Product Owners, esp those with Portfolio responsibility What impact would it make? Improve Aha! for strategic roadmapping How should it work? Me: I'm very excited by the new initiative scoring and prioritising options: https://w...
2
Future consideration
6
VOTE
Allow record links to be previewable in shared web pages/presentations
It is possible to include a "Record links" column in a report that can then be shared as a webpage. However, currently the record links are not available as an option when enabling drill in for the shared webpage. It would be helpful to be able to...
1
Future consideration
9
VOTE
Record Fields should create Relationships
Expected behavior when adding a Record field to a layout is that when records are selected, a relationship link is created. Use Case: We need to drive people to link specific records and leveraged Record Fields; i.e. one or more release, one or mo...
1
Future consideration
9
VOTE
1
VOTE
Ability to move report to a different workspace
What is the challenge? I have created a number of reports in a workspace that I want to move to a product-line for visibility. People get a little antsy when a report lives in their workspace but it is used elsewhere. What is the impact? Feels dis...
0
Already exists
1
VOTE
Reporting on initiatives for multiple record types
What is the challenge? We can't see if epics and features are assigned to the correct initiatives. What is the impact? Lack of proper reporting on initiatives. Describe your idea Dear Team, I have a report starting from ideas, in which we would li...
0
Future consideration
7
VOTE
Show only the user's company name in the portal
Whilst an individual may respond to an idea, they are really a representative of their company or a particular team. Some may prefer not to be individually identified ion a public portal. Hence the ability to replace an individuals name with that ...
2
Future consideration
8
VOTE
Automation: Allow an option to clear multi-value fields
At present, for Users-type custom fields, the automation options are: Add, Remove and 'Same As'.There is no easy way to remove all users. A 'Clear Values' option would be a great addition to Users field type and to other tagged field types.
3
Future consideration
5
VOTE
Component lookup by numeric id for relationships, hashtag referencing etc
Currently, when looking for a specific component via relationship or when using "#" in a note/comment etc and you know the id, you always have to put in the whole id including the workspace prefix. If you only use the numeric id, you don't see any...
0
Future consideration