What is the challenge?
Teams capture both customer feedback and internal stakeholder feedback during research, but cannot clearly flag which interview content is internal versus external.
Without this distinction, all conversations can be treated as if they represent the customer voice, even when some comments come from internal perspectives.
Researchers can misinterpret internal feedback as direct customer evidence.
Synthesis and analysis become less reliable because different feedback sources are mixed together.
Teams have a harder time deciding how insights should be weighted and shared in downstream work.
Allow teams to flag interviews, highlights, or feedback items as internal or external.
Treat internal feedback differently throughout analysis and synthesis workflows.
Make the source of feedback clear so teams can separate customer evidence from internal input.