All ideas
Sort by:
Recent
Status:
Future consideration
Showing 6177
17
VOTE
Make the standard tags field mappable for requirements
Both epics and features have the standard tags field mappable when setting up an integration. Requirements now have a standard tags field added to the record but it is not available in the mappings. It currently requires a custom field be created ...
1
Future consideration
1
VOTE
Adding Customer/Prospect as an option similar to Competitor
Just like we analyze competitor data, we also get immense information from sales/pre-sales on the types of pursuits they are undertaking. If we have a line of sight within product management that allows us to capture the type of customer/prospect,...
0
Future consideration
5
VOTE
Product Modelling based on Capabilities
Besides the ideas, features and epics management with aha, i would propose to add a functionality to "modell your product" - with that i mean a graphical modeller to structure the main functional and technical building blocks of my product. This i...
1
Future consideration
5
VOTE
2
VOTE
Support markdown in the description editor
I write most of my text in a plain text editor like Sublime Text or Notepad++, and use Markdown for formatting, to focus on the text and not have to worry about formatting.Attempting to copy markdown-text (plain text) into the description box here...
0
Future consideration
3
VOTE
Make the terminology around "Organization" customisable
Across most of Aha! you are able to re-name key items, such as Objectives, Epics, Ideas etc... this is great as it helps you align to the terminology used inside your company. It is not currently possible to do this for Organizations. I believe it...
0
Future consideration
2
VOTE
Make the Organisation view shareable
Being able to share a view like the one attached would be great for our externally facing teams that represent the customer when submitting new ideas. This would provide them with useful information to be able to help manage customer expectations.
0
Future consideration
1
VOTE
Option to populate capacity estimates with members of a team when you select a team
We would like the team members to auto-populate (if that's your choice) when you select a team for an advanced estimate. At the moment when you select a team you then have to select the individual members one by one.
0
Future consideration
1
VOTE
Ability to have a mix of team member and team estimates in capacity planning
When we are less certain about a future project, we add capacity at the team level. As we know more, or as team members roll into the project, we add individual capacities. At the moment you can't have team (header level) and member (child level) ...
0
Future consideration
1
VOTE
Checkbox (multi-select) for selecting team members in capacity estimates
When we set capacity estimates, we want to select the team members assigned to the initiative. At the moment you have to select them one by one. The ability to select multiple at once would save us a lot of time. ** We currently go to a bit of an ...
0
Future consideration