Internal users should be able to 'Follow' Organizations they are interested in
As an Internal Aha Dashboards user, I should be able to ‘Follow’ the Organizations that I am interested in. When I follow an Organization, I should be automatically added as a Watcher for any objects (Ideas, Features) that are created by or tagged...
David Barber
about 2 years ago
in Ideas
1
Future consideration
In JATO we have a huge requirement for viewers in particular board members to be able to view the dependencies across the teams but at present there is no way for a viewer to see these directly on the webpage road map view. It would be great it we...
upon testing reviewer access i noticed that whilst there are certain fields that are locked the reviewer is still able to access the edit and configure options on the roadmap resulting in risk to changing something on the PMs roadmap. It may be wo...
jenny patel
about 2 years ago
in Account settings
0
Future consideration
Ability to Toggle Requirements off and on for Sprint Planning
There is currently a checkbox to hide completed items on the sprint planning board. It would be great for a checkbox bellow it that would hide requirements and only show the current features in play for times when a feature has multiple requiremen...
Justin Paulson
over 4 years ago
in Sprints
2
Future consideration
Label the description box on the feature details panel.
When we create a new feature we populate the box labelled description which is mapped to description in JIRA - the user story. . But in the detailed view in AHA! that description text appears in a blank box. Are we able to label this description?
Guest
almost 9 years ago
in Features
1
Unlikely to implement
Hey, GitHub projects/issues support a new field type: iterations. With these iterations you can model sprints for sprint planning. However, custom fields of this type do not show up in the field mapping list for GitHub-integration in aha.io (yes, ...
Guest
about 2 years ago
in GitHub
0
Future consideration
A dependency report can show what features/master features are impacted or related to other features/master features.
We have no report that shows the opposite: which features/master features are not impacted or not related to any other feature/...
Michael Faust
over 6 years ago
in Reports
0
Unlikely to implement
I want to use one set of terminology at the Product Line level and another set within its Products.
ie, Initiatives at the Product Line level and Epics at the Product level.
Allow me to set the terminology for all products in a product line's conf...
Max Cascone
almost 9 years ago
in Releases
0
Already exists
On the Related tab under each list of related records there a very handy View in report link to quickly view the items in a list report where you can bulk edit or view more fields. This would also be very helpful with Custom tables that have a one...
Michael Bruner
over 4 years ago
in Reports
0
Future consideration