Skip to Main Content

Share your product feedback

ADD A NEW IDEA

Pinned ideas

PINNED Chrome extension to capture feedback from anywhere
What is the challenge? We work in many applications and Aha! can not build custom integrations for all of them. This makes it very hard to users of those applications to capture feedback and store it all in Aha! ideas. What is the impact? This res...

Integrations

Showing 1001

Show required fields in integration mapping

When setting up an integration, it would be helpful to have a way to be prompted to map required fields in Jira. Currently, it is possible to create an integration that does not have field mappings for required fields in Jira. This causes the inte...
Madeleine Black about 3 years ago in Jira 1 Future consideration

Do not allow requirements to be mapped without a Links To relationship set

It is possible to create an integration where you have requirements mapped to a Jira record type, and where you have no Links To relationship established to a parent record in Aha! This results in import errors where requirements cannot be importe...
Madeleine Black about 3 years ago in Jira 0 Future consideration

Allow To-Do's to be mapped to JIRA Issue Types

We would like to be able to make better use of Aha To-Do's so that they carry over to our JIRA Agile installation. Currently we have Initiatives mapped to Epics, Features Mapped to Stories and Requirements Mapped to a custom JIRA type of Requireme...
Guest over 10 years ago in Jira 5 Unlikely to implement

Trello Integration: Aha Release & Trello List

Add the option to have Aha create and update Trello Lists. When teams are using Trello for Project Management they typically need to have the Release and Trello list tied. The features become cards in Trello then they use something like Trello Hel...
Dan Pohlman over 7 years ago in Trello 0 Future consideration

Zeplin Integration

I'm not sure how you'd technically make this work, but as a product manager I'm always looking for ways to better coordinate my feature definitions with the wireframes and high-fidelity comps produced by our design team. We've really taken to a to...
Guest almost 9 years ago in Integrations 2 Unlikely to implement

Allow for parent-child linking across Jira projects without using an integration template

Some organizations that use SAFe store high-level records in one Jira project and the tactical work in team-specific Jira projects. These are often integrated to the same Aha! workspace. Today, you have to use the same integration template in the ...
Emily Yankush over 2 years ago in Jira 0 Future consideration

Ability to filter records in the ‘integration updates’ based on a field (eg: categories or tags)

Currently Integration update brings in all new records from Rally project. And there is no way to filter the data before import. Want the ability to filter on some Rally fields (eg. status & tags) which will help to import on the required reco...
Jyothirmayi Talaparthy over 5 years ago in Rally 3 Future consideration

Viva Engage (Yammer) ideas integration

What is the challenge? Ideas/Roadmaps integration with viva engage (yammer) similar to slack or teams integrations. What is the impact? We currently share updates from roadmaps and ideas with stakeholders and teams via yammer rather than teams. De...
Simone Bilton about 1 year ago in Integrations / Wanted 0 Future consideration

Integrating with a specific Jira board

It would be helpful if we could use the Jira integration to send features to a specific board. We have several dev teams working within a single project, but they utilize different broads. We would like to send a feature to open a record is a spec...
Reut Levi over 3 years ago in Jira 1 Future consideration

Include Area Path in VSTS Integration

I really like the VSTS integration 2.0, however could you add Area Path to the list of available fields that can be mapped to. This would be useful as in VSTS we use Area Path to note which dev team has picked up a feature and it would be great to...
Guest over 7 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 3 Future consideration