Allow integrations to be setup from a system setting - not tied to a user
What is the challenge? We had a former development manager set up some integrations and this is tied to that development manager's user. When we disabled the user (part of the security process when someone leaves, it disabled and wiped away the in...
C Gordon
11 months ago
in API
0
Future consideration
What is the challenge? We use tags to group epics, features, and requirements. Sometimes a requirement belongs to multiple tags, where the parent feature may not. Currently there is no option to bulk-edit tags in requirements, as there is with fea...
Nic S
11 months ago
in Features
0
Future consideration
Adjustable table width in Features roadmap in reports category
1. For us, fixed release plans are normally 2-3 times in next 2-3 years and the next platform is coming with different product.
So even if there are only 2-3 releases in one page, the width of release plan is fixed with very narrow width and most ...
Guest
over 7 years ago
in Roadmaps
1
Future consideration
As we have multiple integrations with different names setup and each feature is tied to one of them, it would be very beneficial to see which card belongs to each integration at a glance. Please add "integration name" option to feature card custom...
Guest
over 4 years ago
in Features
0
Future consideration
Add a group called "None" to the Paid seats group, right now we have no way to know if someone is in that group
Our instance uses paid seat groups,
We have 93 paid seats, and the Account>Billing page shows 80 / 93 in use.
However that is not the accurate picture.
If you go to the Users page, you can see 13 others assignged to "None"
So we have no ilcens...
Guest
over 7 years ago
in Account settings
0
Future consideration
I would like to be able to create default rows/values in a custom table. For our use case, we would like a table for DoD which includes several default values from a drop down in a row (i.e. Acceptance Criteria Met, Testing Requirements Met, etc) ...
Guest
over 6 years ago
in Custom tables
1
Future consideration
Ability to place an owner on a release phase and have that owner automatically assigned to all to-do tasks
We have a large release checklist to ship our products. We want to organize it by department. We want to have a single owner for each department and we want the to do tasks for each department to have a default assignee by product.
Jonathan Bier
over 6 years ago
in Releases
2
Unlikely to implement
What is the challenge? Our company is very large and our product have a lot of overlaps with many companies so competitors. It's hard to quickly list the one who are competitive to a specific domain What is the impact? I spend a lot of time trying...
Guest
11 months ago
in Strategy
0
Future consideration
Let calendar panels be affected by dashboard filters
What is the challenge? Currently, dashboard filters do not affect calendar panels ("This panel type is not compatible with dashboard filters"). What is the impact? One of our main dashboard use cases is to show a release calendar from a very broad...
Guest
11 months ago
in Calendar
0
Future consideration