a similar set of features could easily have a common score profile and it would be nice to be able to bulk-score (bulk-edit) the score of a series of features to avoid having to enter the same stuff over and over.
Thank you for your idea. We wanted to share some functionality that will help.
On the prioritization page, you can review individual records and quickly edit scores in-line on a single view. Using automated scorecard metrics (Enterprise+), you can automate your scores to reflect data you are already capturing in Aha! records.
Given the recent improvements to streamline the process of scoring records, we are unlikely to implement this idea. We hope you understand.
Am I right in saying the admin's response is that we should use an automated scorecard update for a single scorecard -ignoring the fact this is a request for bulk editing across multiple, similarly sized records?
The ability to both bulk upload, bulk edit in app (eg: a grid structure view), and bulk adjust (eg: via CSV) would be hugely beneficial. Also, I believe that it should be possible to assign values as part of the initial setup of a release - at the moment you cannot add Scorecards to the 'Pop-Up Release', so you have to go back in and assign these after the fact.
The individual data points for the scorecard should be API points to allow granular adjustment via csv/upload
This is a must have
As a workaround, I managed to bulk update my scorecard values by exporting to CSV, changing the values and importing the data from the CSV into Aha! again. This overwrites existing scorecard values. Nevertheless, this feature would be highly desirable.
I'm really surprised this is not already a feature. It doesn't interrupt any other workflows and would bring a lot of value and relieve a lot of frustration.
Definitely needed please.
This looks to be a very old idea - that's still in future consideration...? This functionality is essential to manage accurate scorecard parameters - when scoring changes or is updated. When will this be included - ever?
I agree that bulk edit and inheritance options would be extremely useful.
Also would find this useful, and/or having the feature score inherited from the master feature. For example, we currently have a master feature that's crossing 5 products with ~4 features per product. It gets pretty redundant, but understand that there is a complexity there because the score card can be different per product. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
We would also find this extremely useful on Features as well as on Ideas.
this says 'likely to implement' but is from 2015 - any update?