Skip to Main Content
ADD A NEW IDEA

Features

Showing 745

Option to restrict Features to the same release as the epic

Would like to see an option in the account / workspace to only allow features to be associated with the same release as the epic.
Guest over 2 years ago in Features 1 Future consideration

Show the feature rank on the feature card details

When viewing an individual feature card (especially after searching for a feature) it is easy to lose context of how important that particular feature is, since you cannot necessarily see it listed against all the other features in the feature boa...
Robert Wood almost 4 years ago in Features 4 Future consideration

Sync status updates between Features and their associated Releases

Currently when any feature changed their status from Backlog to In Progress, the associated Release should be manually updated to reflect the changes. There is a functionality to sync status updates between epics and their associated features, and...
Guest about 3 years ago in Features 1 Future consideration

Target, Commit and Stretch Lines in Feature Board

Similar to Capacity line in the feature board , we would like a target, commit, and stretch line with user defined % of capacity. Ex, 80% = commit, 100% = Target, 120% = Stretch with 3 lines. This way I could have a quick visual of my capacity in ...
Guest about 8 years ago in Features 1 Future consideration

Auto calculation of feature dates

It would be useful if the start and end dates of a feature could be auto calculated, so that once placed in a release and linked to any dependencies then the dates should not require any other changes. This would make both the planning of dates an...
John Biltcliffe over 6 years ago in Features 9 Future consideration

Reporting on initiatives for multiple record types

What is the challenge? We can't see if epics and features are assigned to the correct initiatives. What is the impact? Lack of proper reporting on initiatives. Describe your idea Dear Team, I have a report starting from ideas, in which we would li...
Krisztina Hodjan about 2 months ago in Features 0 Future consideration

Include linked record/relationship field as an option for automated scorecard metrics

It would be valuable to be able to include standard fields that are derived from linked records in automated scorecard metrics. For example, I may want to create a metric that assigns a score based on the name of the goal(s) that a feature is asso...
Brittany Rhoney 9 months ago in Features 2 Future consideration

Allow Drill-in for Feature columns on Prioritization view

Who would benefit? Users sharing Prioritization views via shared webpage What impact would it make? Increase ease of use for drill-in functionality by enabling the function on the default columns How should it work? The default Feature Name column...
Stephanie Lechner 7 months ago in Features 0 Future consideration

Allow for additional fields to be included when drafting release notes

Who would benefit? Technical Writers and consumers of product release notes What impact would it make? It allows us to include additional information beyond just a text summary of new features. How should it work? After selecting records to draft ...
John Gartner-Baca 7 months ago in Features 0 Future consideration

Roll up feature delivery risks to parent epics

It would be helpful to have an option to configure roll up for delivery risks. For example, if a feature is at risk, we can reasonably assume the parent epic is also at risk, so we should display the flag there as well- with a link to the relevant...
Reilly O'Connor about 1 year ago in Features 0 Future consideration