Skip to Main Content
ADD A NEW IDEA

Azure DevOps Services and Server

Showing 89

Inherit the hierarchy of the area paths from Azure Dev Ops

When integrating with Azure Dev Ops, the area paths should inherit the same hierarchy when represented in Aha. For example, hierarchy in Dev Ops could be: Company/ Company /Functional Area Company/Functional Area/Team The Aha Azure devops integrat...
John M almost 4 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 5 Future consideration

Include author of comment from Azure DevOps when saving to Aha

We use the Aha <-> Azure DevOps integration. Comments from Aha include the author when synced to AzDO (Comment added by <user> in Aha! - View). The reverse is not true. Comments made in AzDO that come to Aha do not say the other, just ...
Guest over 1 year ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Update records selectively

The "Update Records" feature currently updates all integrated records defined in the Azure DevOps integration. This could take quite some time if the number of records is high. Sometimes you only want to upgrade on a particular record type because...
Guest over 3 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Aha! Releases Should Honor ADO Area by Default

I am unsure why this feature was designed this way; However, when creating and pushing a release from Aha! to ADO, it should honor the area path set up in the Aha! to ADO integration. Furthermore, when linking to an existing iteration in ADO, the ...
I R over 1 year ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Sync sprints between requirements in Aha! and equivalent (e.g. PBIs) in Azure DevOps

Our development team manages PBIs within sprints. Currently you can map a custom sprint field for features in Aha! to DevOps, but not requirements. Ideally, we would be able to sync sprints for requirements/PBIs, as that would be more useful than ...
Mike Maylone almost 4 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Allow two-way integration for picklist fields in Azure DevOps when using the XML process model

This idea is a variation on https://big.ideas.aha.io/ideas/AFME-I-2, but the general use case is the same. I've been asked by Aha support to make a separate idea specifically for those using the XML process model, since this has supposedly been fi...
Tessa Adair over 3 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Ability to customize the Import Import New Records dialog box and functionality

It would be very helpful to be able to customize and configure the Import New Records dialog box. Specifically I would like to be able to select additional/different information about each record (i.e. Azure DevOps work item #, State, Iteration) i...
cheryl fetchko almost 5 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Limit workspace users choice to 1 user instead of multiple (like the Assigned to) field

I need to add the workspace users as a custom field in my template and currently it doesn't limit to just one user, it allows multiple users which I cannot have. Can we have an option to make it a single choice only. in the attached graphic is the...
Stacy Monnahan about 2 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Allow mapping Release as a field on Requirements in Azure DevOps integration

Due to our iterations setup in Azure DevOps (ADO) we do not currently map Releases as a record. We are sending this instead as a field on the Epic and Feature records to a custom field in ADO. We would like to do the same on Requirements but it is...
Guest about 3 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Text formatting when sending to Azure Boards

When sending work items Azure Boards, bulleted lists don't work properly in Azure. If I have a bulleted list in Aha, tabbing the bulleted list in Azure does not increase the level of the bullets. It just adds tabbed space between the text and the ...
Guest about 2 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration