API

Who would benefit? Aha! administrators What impact would it make? It would help track the API usage across the instance. For example, if someone is generating heavy traffic by creating thousands of Aha features per minute, we as admins need a meth...

Who would benefit? Users wanting to access this data externally What impact would it make? Allow users to use this data outside of Aha (i.e. external reports, dashboards, etc.). This would allow us to keep track of when something is at risk. How s...

Hi All, currently every user with Aha! access can create an api token or authorize Apps to use the Api. And the Scope is tied to the user itself and not configurable. When it comes to projects, utilizing the API, it is the Application Owner / Admi...

I am interested in your software but I need the following two asks: I need this to have a native integration with Adobe Workfront or at least a RESTAPI with Workfront Fusion and if your software is compliant with SAFe Framework. Thanks.

Mixpanel would be a useful product to integrate with.

What is the challenge? Aha! does not have an API end point that provides subscription details - plan type, number of seats. What is the impact? Teams would like the ability to programmatically call for subscription details to keep subscription det...

For "List ideas" and "List ideas for a product" endpoints, it would be useful to have the ability to filter on visibility values. In my application I want to display a list of just ideas with specific visibility values, not all values. Currently I...

I would like to have timestamps supported in the API for any user action oriented dates (like create dates, updated dates, etc.). Currently the timestamp is not included for the status_changed_on field. I'd like for timestamps to be supported for ...

What is the challenge? I would like to integrate Aha! activity logs into my SIEM but cannot access the information from the Account > Activity table via the API. What is the impact? Unable to integrate with the corporate SIEM without th...

What is the challenge? Be able to handle value from audit without deduced the "impacted" json field changes and without process the current string provided in "value" by sending both value separately to let developer handle them on their side if...