Skip to Main Content

Share your product feedback

ADD A NEW IDEA

Capacity planning

Showing 172

Customizable named range CP4T scenario broken out by record type

Who would benefit? This would benefit any teams that are using capacity planning for teams and estimate their work using custom named ranges What impact would it make? I would be able to set up one custom named ranges scenario that encompasses all...
Justin Waldorf 10 months ago in Capacity planning 0 Future consideration

Integrate Capacity Planning with ADO Velocity

Who would benefit? Product managers and Engineers What impact would it make? Enable easier Capacity Planning in Aha How should it work? A product squad's velocity, as measured in ADO, would flow through to Aha, informing that team's capacity plans
Shannon Gupta 11 months ago in Capacity planning 0 Future consideration

Add Ability for Asset or Resource Allocation

Who would benefit? Anyone who is allocating physical assets to a development or customer What impact would it make? Ability to manage availability and report on limited assets How should it work? Similar to capacity planning, create an asset group...
Gary Goz 11 months ago in Capacity planning 0 Future consideration

Allow the Feature Name column in a capacity report to be re-sizeable

Who would benefit? Product Owners What impact would it make? The clarity provided within a capacity report would be greatly enhanced How should it work? Some Features have the same prefix that is large with the last part of the Feature Name indica...
Stephen J about 1 year ago in Capacity planning 0 Future consideration

Remove teams from Capacity Planning for teams report if they are not associated to the reported scenario

Who would benefit? Everyone using Capacity Planning for Teams What impact would it make? Currently, teams that are not using the reported scenario still appear in the Capacity Report. By removing these teams, this would reduce any confusion. How s...
Shumona Raha about 1 year ago in Capacity planning 0 Future consideration

Capacity planning - Do not allocate capacity in the past but only in the future

Who would benefit? Any User of the Capacity Planning report What impact would it make? Make it very clear when a non-completed item (Initiative, Epic, Feature) needs to be reschedule in the future. Rescheduling it will probably surface a capacity ...
Sébastien Lievain about 1 year ago in Capacity planning 0 Future consideration

'Add as logged time' setting only works on initial completion

Current behavior (working as expected): Create a feature in Aha! And send it to Jira Update the “Story Points” field in Jira to 10p which syncs back to Aha! Change the Jira Story status to ‘Done’ which syncs back to Aha! and updates the ‘actual ef...
Max Robbins about 1 year ago in Capacity planning 0 Future consideration

cumulative, by week, month, year, etc. for the load

cumulative, by week, month, year, etc. for load / capacity with cumulative by week, month, year, etc.
Guest about 1 year ago in Capacity planning 2 Future consideration

number of people in a team with one decimal place

Hello, I would like to be able to enter a number of people in a team with a comma (decimal point). for example, in the Back team I have 2.5 developers
Guest about 1 year ago in Capacity planning 0 Future consideration

Initial estimates -option to change the default to support parallel planning

Currently the initial estimate defaults to the number of days between the start and end date of an EPIC (and feature). At the EPIC level this can through off our capacity planning if the advance estimates are not updated when the EPIC is created. ...
Ruth Gardiner over 1 year ago in Capacity planning 0 Future consideration