Customizable named range CP4T scenario broken out by record type
Who would benefit? This would benefit any teams that are using capacity planning for teams and estimate their work using custom named ranges What impact would it make? I would be able to set up one custom named ranges scenario that encompasses all...
Justin Waldorf
10 months ago
in Capacity planning
0
Future consideration
Who would benefit? Product managers and Engineers What impact would it make? Enable easier Capacity Planning in Aha How should it work? A product squad's velocity, as measured in ADO, would flow through to Aha, informing that team's capacity plans
Shannon Gupta
11 months ago
in Capacity planning
0
Future consideration
Who would benefit? Anyone who is allocating physical assets to a development or customer What impact would it make? Ability to manage availability and report on limited assets How should it work? Similar to capacity planning, create an asset group...
Allow the Feature Name column in a capacity report to be re-sizeable
Who would benefit? Product Owners What impact would it make? The clarity provided within a capacity report would be greatly enhanced How should it work? Some Features have the same prefix that is large with the last part of the Feature Name indica...
Stephen J
about 1 year ago
in Capacity planning
0
Future consideration
Remove teams from Capacity Planning for teams report if they are not associated to the reported scenario
Who would benefit? Everyone using Capacity Planning for Teams What impact would it make? Currently, teams that are not using the reported scenario still appear in the Capacity Report. By removing these teams, this would reduce any confusion. How s...
Shumona Raha
about 1 year ago
in Capacity planning
0
Future consideration
Capacity planning - Do not allocate capacity in the past but only in the future
Who would benefit? Any User of the Capacity Planning report What impact would it make? Make it very clear when a non-completed item (Initiative, Epic, Feature) needs to be reschedule in the future. Rescheduling it will probably surface a capacity ...
Sébastien Lievain
about 1 year ago
in Capacity planning
0
Future consideration
'Add as logged time' setting only works on initial completion
Current behavior (working as expected): Create a feature in Aha! And send it to Jira Update the “Story Points” field in Jira to 10p which syncs back to Aha! Change the Jira Story status to ‘Done’ which syncs back to Aha! and updates the ‘actual ef...
Max Robbins
about 1 year ago
in Capacity planning
0
Future consideration
Initial estimates -option to change the default to support parallel planning
Currently the initial estimate defaults to the number of days between the start and end date of an EPIC (and feature). At the EPIC level this can through off our capacity planning if the advance estimates are not updated when the EPIC is created. ...
Ruth Gardiner
over 1 year ago
in Capacity planning
0
Future consideration