Skip to Main Content

Share your product feedback

ADD A NEW IDEA

Azure DevOps Services and Server

Showing 118

Allow mapping Release as a field on Requirements in Azure DevOps integration

Due to our iterations setup in Azure DevOps (ADO) we do not currently map Releases as a record. We are sending this instead as a field on the Epic and Feature records to a custom field in ADO. We would like to do the same on Requirements but it is...
Guest about 4 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Sync the change of parent link made in Aha! across 2 Azure DevOps integrations

Who would benefit? Customers with multiple integrations set up to ADO who are wanting to move features to different Epics as their plans change. What impact would it make? How should it work? The parent/child relationship should be tracked across ...
Stuart Blair over 1 year ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Provide the ability to map the Release field from a Feature or Epic to an external system such as ADO

Given that AHA is all about releases and ADO is all about time lines, the concept of a Release in AHA is quite different than what exist in ADO - yet there is a Target Release field in ADO as well as in the Feature of AHA - please can this be expo...
Dirk K about 4 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 1 Future consideration

Exportable list of orphaned workitems in Integrations update modal

Who would benefit? Aha admins, dev lead What impact would it make? Improved collaboration, minimizing integrations admin How should it work? Use case: I want to inform and support development team creating Azure Devops work items on Requirement le...
Mats Hultgren over 1 year ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Sync DevOps Commenter Name in Comment Sync

We are an outsourced product management company, so we have alot of integrations to alot of our customers. We have found that when an individual in one of our customers orgs makes a comment, the comment text is sync'd, but the name of the person w...
Guest over 4 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Add ability to transfer requirements between features and features between master features (epics)

If you take the typical hierarchy VSTS, of Epics, Features and Product Backlog items, its is great that with Integrations 2.0 we can map these to Master Features (we call these Epics), Features and Requirements (we call this PBI's). However we are...
Richard Harrison over 7 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Aha! Azure DevOps Integration Community

Is anyone interested in starting up a Aha! Azure DevOps Integration Community to share ideas, best practices, discussions on how you solved complex integration problems.
Deb kelchner over 4 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Limit workspace users choice to 1 user instead of multiple (like the Assigned to) field

I need to add the workspace users as a custom field in my template and currently it doesn't limit to just one user, it allows multiple users which I cannot have. Can we have an option to make it a single choice only. in the attached graphic is the...
Stacy Monnahan almost 3 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Text formatting when sending to Azure Boards

When sending work items Azure Boards, bulleted lists don't work properly in Azure. If I have a bulleted list in Aha, tabbing the bulleted list in Azure does not increase the level of the bullets. It just adds tabbed space between the text and the ...
Guest about 3 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 0 Future consideration

Allow scheduled update of all linked records for DevOps

As the service hooks from DevOps to Aha are seldomly failing, it often results in having some records not in sync in Aha. This can be solved by running an update of all the linked records from the Aha integration page, but this requires to be manu...
Nicola Rolando about 3 years ago in Azure DevOps Services and Server 2 Future consideration