Azure DevOps Services and Server

What is the challenge? For Releases Attachments are not supported in Integration Set Up How would you solve it? Manually Project Managers are uploading in Devops What impact would it make? It will reduce so much of manual work

Who would benefit? Customers with multiple integrations set up to ADO who are wanting to move features to different Epics as their plans change. What impact would it make? How should it work? The parent/child relationship should be tracked across ...

Who would benefit? Aha admins, dev lead What impact would it make? Improved collaboration, minimizing integrations admin How should it work? Use case: I want to inform and support development team creating Azure Devops work items on Requirement le...

Who would benefit? Integration users What impact would it make? How should it work? When you delete a feature which is linked to a dev system you get a warning (attached). When you delete an epic, you do not get a consitent warning. This suggestio...

Who would benefit? Admins of accounts with ADO integrations What impact would it make? When an ADO integration is created, a user with the correct permissions must enter their token to authenticate the integration. However, the token owner's name ...

We found that changing the key-field string of a custom field will break existing integrations with ADO where the custom field is synced to an ADO field. There is no warning or anything. This is a big risk to us and to the trust that integration r...

Sometimes I'd just like to fix a record or two that have gotten out of sync. When I click on the Integrations menu for a particular feature, I have the option to resend all fields to my development tool (Aha -> ADO), or, to delete the link. IDE...

Sometimes, the feature in ADO already exists, and I want to link it to a feature in Aha. When I do this, I'm presented with an un-readable HTML output of the description fields, making is pretty much impossible to actually see the differences. See...

We have features that are mapped to a specific sprint, but within that feature, we have requirements (user stories) that could be mapped to two different sprints. The assumption with Aha! is that a feature would be completed in one sprint, which i...

Update the Feature % Complete field based on User Stories of the DevOps Feature that is linked to the Aha Feature. The Software Product Plan does just that! In DevOps, this information is a calculated field, which can be easily configured in Board...