My ideas: Azure DevOps Services and Server

Currently, if a user adds a comment to a User Story or Bug discussion in VSTS and embeds an image in the comment, the image doesn't come through with the comment that shows up in Aha!. This makes it difficult for the reader in Aha! to follow the d...

We are trying sync the Feature order from Aha to VSTS (never the other way around). Keeping the Features in VSTS in the same order in Aha is in our use case, critical to using the integration. The reason that it fails is because matching the Aha R...

I'm not sure how much demand there would be for this, but I've had a need a few times for it so I'm going to suggest it. I would like to be able to limit automatic integration of new requirements if they are in a certain state, such as New. If a f...

I can't get my Sprint to land in the right area, it winds up under main as another project instead of sprint under a project when structure is Main>Project>Sprint.

When a file has been uploaded to aha that is larger than the maximum file size,then integrate without the file in TFS, adding a note indicating this. This will allow the team to collborate on the TFS items without having to delete the file.

I really like the VSTS integration 2.0, however could you add Area Path to the list of available fields that can be mapped to. This would be useful as in VSTS we use Area Path to note which dev team has picked up a feature and it would be great to...

The default behaviour of how the TFS/VSTS integration sends time Estimates in minutes is very limiting. I don't know any agile team that would be estimating Features or Requirements down to minutes, so it doesn't make sense for the integration to ...

After the updated TFS integration which allows records to be imported directly from TFS into Aha. It would be ideal to be able to search the new record list for key words. Currently you can filter the list but this is not very user friendly and if...

If you take the typical hierarchy VSTS, of Epics, Features and Product Backlog items, its is great that with Integrations 2.0 we can map these to Master Features (we call these Epics), Features and Requirements (we call this PBI's). However we are...