GitHub
Sort by:
Popular
Status:
Showing 34
2
VOTE
Github issues to get Aha feature ID in their name
We typically reference feature requests by the Aha feature ID, e.g. WEB-32 or WEB-44. When we push those feature requests down to Github for development, we generally create a branch for each issue, but since we lose this information it's difficul...
2
Unlikely to implement
2
VOTE
1
VOTE
Add support for GitHub Issue Types
What is the challenge? GitHub is introducing support for Issue Types In beta/previous mode currently https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/configuring-issues/managing-issue-types-in-an-organization https://github.blog/ch...
0
Future consideration
1
VOTE
Add status filter to Github importer
The importer shows all repository issues, including closed issues. It also doesn't show what the issue status is, so we must click through them to find those we want to import. I suggest: adding a status filter, set it to show open issues only sho...
0
Future consideration
1
VOTE
Support Syncing of Requirement Tags To Github
Who would benefit? Anyone with a GitHub Integration What impact would it make? Right now, the syncing of an Aha! Item Requirement's tag is not supported. This means any requirement that the visibility of tags on a requirement is lost in GitHub if ...
0
Future consideration
1
VOTE
Sync iteration fields from GitHub to aha.io
Hey, GitHub projects/issues support a new field type: iterations. With these iterations you can model sprints for sprint planning. However, custom fields of this type do not show up in the field mapping list for GitHub-integration in aha.io (yes, ...
0
Future consideration
1
VOTE
Allow mapping custom field to static value
In GitHub integration, we would like to map a custom field called "Repository" to a static value that is identical for all issues from the one GitHub integration. That way we could then show the value as a label and also filter by it in feature vi...
0
Future consideration
1
VOTE
Send all features from release to github
From the release details, on the integrations, allow sending (and re-sending) all features in the release to GitHub.
Currently, one needs to manually send each individual feature to GitHub when starting a new release, which can take a really long...
2
Already exists
1
VOTE
1
VOTE
GitHub Commit Hook shouldn't add commenting user as a watcher (or shouldn't run as user)
When the GitHub Commit Hook is run, it adds me (the user who created the integration) as a watcher on whatever features are referenced. This becomes a huge notification nightmare pretty quickly.
It would be great if the comments on features as a ...
0
Future consideration
© 2024 Aha! Labs Inc.•All rights reserved