In GitHub integration, we would like to map a custom field called "Repository" to a static value that is identical for all issues from the one GitHub integration. That way we could then show the value as a label and also filter by it in feature vi...
Guest
over 3 years ago
in GitHub
0
Future consideration
Need: To be able to sync Feature Status with Project Columns from multiple projects. Additional Info:Our team uses two github project boards (one for scoping, and one for dev) both with their respective project columns. It would be extremely helpf...
James Simpson
almost 4 years ago
in GitHub
2
Future consideration
Synch story point estimates between Zenhub and Aha Epics (features)
We have linked Epics (Features) in Aha with Epics in Github Enterprise, and that is working fine. however we are using Zenhub to create story point estimates within Github, and would like to be able to reflect those estimates in Aha so we can do c...
Guest
about 5 years ago
in GitHub
4
Future consideration
From the release details, on the integrations, allow sending (and re-sending) all features in the release to GitHub.
Currently, one needs to manually send each individual feature to GitHub when starting a new release, which can take a really long...
Tiago Sousa
over 5 years ago
in GitHub
2
Already exists
Allow for a check list to be copied to the GitHub product AND not change the check list in the originating work activity.
The check list (versus ordered / unordered list) in the text field is very nice. However, integration process translates the Check List to an unordered list in GitHub and then updates that back to the originating work activity. This process change...
Guest
over 5 years ago
in GitHub
0
Future consideration
GitHub Integration: Aha! Release to Github Release mapping
As a product manager setting up my GitHub integration, I want to map Aha releases to GitHub releases directly, to avoid confusing developers and make Aha adoption less painful.
Guest
almost 6 years ago
in GitHub
0
Future consideration
Our QA team has a hard time seeing the story of a ticket due to all of commit messages. It would be nice if instead of appearing as just comments the Github commits appeared separately or were able to be be filtered out.
Guest
almost 6 years ago
in GitHub
0
Future consideration
GitHub Commit Hook shouldn't add commenting user as a watcher (or shouldn't run as user)
When the GitHub Commit Hook is run, it adds me (the user who created the integration) as a watcher on whatever features are referenced. This becomes a huge notification nightmare pretty quickly.
It would be great if the comments on features as a ...
Guest
about 6 years ago
in GitHub
0
Future consideration
Ability to pull data from public repositories on Github
As an open source company, we track hundreds of projects hosted by Github, many of which we do not own or administer.
We would benefit from a Github integration that allows us to track public Github repositories. There is no need to update the rep...
Guest
about 6 years ago
in GitHub
0
Will not implement
Change GIT Integration to Separate from Human Comments
Right now all GIT commits (with task IDs) are populating the human comments. Ideally, this would be in a separate list, so there's not so much noise in the comments.
Guest
about 6 years ago
in GitHub
1
Unlikely to implement