Application

Please consider remove that section if no similar ideas were found.

We use charts to show the allocation of features to different products or other data. The items on our charts are always listed based on alphabetical order. We would like to reorder the list to group items appropriately.

Can we add a tree (nested) view for larger portfolios for folders to nest within? Similar functionality as the move folder view? Can it also show more of the name views so it does not get truncated?

In the strategy roadmap view, the assignees show for all the Epics. However, the assignee does not shop in the roadmap view for the projects.

We have over 250+ custom fields being utilized by various workspaces. Because we cannot assign a custom field to a particular workspace all 250+ fields are visible in every filter in every workspace. If we could have the ability to define which wo...

I'm wondering if it would be possible to create an enhancement for custom scorecards that the formula for the individual metrics. I've attached a screenshot with the particular issue I'm asking about. In particular, this is directly related to the...

It would be great to allow for cards (epics, features, requirements) to move in any "card" based view. A great example is Google Keep (Web version on Desktop). Google Keep allows for easy moving of cards and pinning of favorites to the top. Add in...

the toolips on estimates fields need consistent messaging in all field contexts, with proper messaging/tip content based on the units of the configuration. this needs to be the UX when creating (actual configured units not a hard-coded either/or t...

apply rank opens a picker to let user decide which custom field to apply the rank value to , and that custom field needs to be the field in the mappings that provide update into target tooling (my case, its ADO, stack rank). I see multiple custom ...

We would like to continuously deploy the CSS and HTML of the public Ideas portal from our CI system, via the API. Right now looks like that is not possible, the only workaround being reverse-engineering the form.